this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
143 points (96.7% liked)

Anything But Metric

630 readers
3 users here now

Americans will use anything but metric

The Rules:

  1. Posts must be a screenshot, crosspost, or link to someone using a bizarre unit of measurement (33 lanes wide, as heavy as 10 semi-trucks, etc.)

  2. Standard units are not allowed, unless it's a sufficiently bizarre usage of the unit (this is up to mod discretion.)

  3. Intentionally terrible units are completely fine! Satire is welcome here

  4. Curses are fine, slurs are not. If there are slurs in something you want to post, please blur them, or reconsider posting.

  5. Flag NSFW content as such. NSFW words in these posts don't need to be censored.

  6. Post titles should be just the unit of measurement used (not the thing being measured!), and should be the full name of the unit (Apples and Bags of Apples imply very different things!) NSFW units should be partially censored. If there are multiple units, list as many as you want. If the source is satire, the title should start with [Satire]

  7. In the comments be civil, both to each other AND the subject of posts.

Mod Policy:

founded 9 months ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It seems baby elephants weight 100-200 kg depending on the species, let's say 150

Corgis are 50-70 cm in length, let's say 60

If we assume that the meteoroid was a sphere with a diameter of 1 Corgi length, that would make the density

150 kg / (τ/3 * (60 cm / 2)^3) ≈ 2652 kg/m³

If we assume that the meteoroid was the same volume as a Corgi, it's a bit more difficult to estimate. Corgis are kind of like a cylinder with 60 cm height and 20 cm diameter. That would put the density at

150 kg / (τ/2 * (20 cm / 2)^2 * 60 cm) ≈ 7958 kg/m³

Both are reasonable for a meteoroid; the first one would likely be an S-type asteroid (consists of silicates), the second an M-type (consists of metals).

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

Huh. Thanks. Turns out baby elephants weigh less and corgis are longer than I thought.

Maybe it'd've been better to use metric, after all.