this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10548 readers
289 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The full text of section 107 says that the federal minister responsible for labour may “do such things as to the Minister seem likely to maintain or secure industrial peace and to promote conditions favourable to the settlement of industrial disputes or differences and to those ends the Minister may refer any question to the Board or direct the Board to do such things as the Minister deems necessary.”

Since June 2024, section 107 has been invoked eight times to interfere with bargaining or end strikes, including those by postal workers, flight attendants and railway workers.

“When big corporations complain, the government caves,” Gazan said while tabling the bill on Monday. “This is a direct violation of workers’ rights, the right to strike and the right to free collective bargaining. These rights were won through generations of struggle and sacrifice, yet government after government violates the rights of workers whenever it is politically convenient.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nutpantz@feddit.online -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

taxed that are for worthwhile projects make sense. the transcanada highway is one good example. however building a opera house for the elite is not. and neither is day to day delivery of mail when the vast majority of people only get a letter 4 times a month. most bills are online, and NO ONE sends hand written letters anymore for personal reasons. its a waste of taxes to keep jobs for people who demand they have jobs for life.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Okay, it's just that the argument you wrote out there has implications far beyond the mail.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Besides, it would be simple enough to just mandate that 'last-mile' delivery is the exclusive right of Canada Post, which would have the effect of:

  • not letting companies pick and choose the profitable routes while handing off deliveries that are money-losing to CanPost;
  • guaranteeing good wages, benefits, and working conditions for all delivery workers.
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure I'd call full nationalisation of an industry "simple", especially when it steps on American toes that much. But I guess yes, it is an option.

[–] patatas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Sure, maybe not 'simple', but it wouldn't be nationalising the entire shipping industry either - just the final leg of delivery