this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
416 points (98.4% liked)

politics

26064 readers
2838 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

All the more reason to show up for the No Kings Rally near you on Saturday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I ageee. But at the same time. This is where democracy plays in. Even though I believe trump stole the 2024 election (3 million + purged votes). He won the PV and EC. The American people elected him to lead, as did they with electing republicans to a majority in congress.

THEY CHOSE THIS! Overthrowing the president goes against the will of the people. However, that’s where Congress is supposed to uplhold the constitution, which they aren’t by allowing this pedo to do whatever he wants.

Also, overthrowing the government of the Philippines is a lot easier than the US. Unless we all agree to just tank the economy by not working.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://generalstrikeus.com/

Tank the economy. The alternative is not better.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I’m down, but we have to be a collective to work, no backing out.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I'm committed. I've already rehearsed what I would say to my manager/HR and fully accept that it may end my employment with them. But as somebody who's financially secure, I feel it's my duty to make that sacrifice should it come to it.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

We no longer live in communities, rather we live in "markets."

With so many people living paycheck to paycheck, we need a significant shift in our culture and a real sense of community. Cooperation rather than competition.

"Rugged individualism" has really become "every man for themselves."

[–] Cenzorrll@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

That's the point of the website

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I'll take one "tank the economy" please.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, the president failed. So… where are all the calls for impeachment this time? Funny how that’s not happening yet every past president for decades had to deal with the other side threatening that.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He was impeached 2, 3? Times?

It doesn't force him out and it isn't very helpful.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My bad I forgot that this time it will do something because reasons.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You’re completely missing the point

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What's the point then dude?

After how many sternly worded letters do you expect Nazis to throw in the towel?

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The point is that he hasn’t been impeached this time…. Why? I find it odd. If all you have to say is random nonsense and ventriloquism, just move on.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What happens to him when he gets impeached this time?

Please describe to me the cause and effect you are expecting to take place that results in meaningful change.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You’re still missing the point 🤦‍♂️

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't articulate a fucking point

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your egocentric interpretation prevents you from understanding basic sentences because you do not have the ability to stop putting words in other people’s mouths.

If it’s not my responsibility to write a sentence down on your level. Perhaps toss it into an LLM.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You still haven’t said how another impeachment would change anything.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My original comment was not a call to impeach him, it was questioning why this term—after this entire shit show—have no impeachment efforts been made, when previous presidents have been impeached for far less.

I’ll have a conversation about that, but not about “why bother?” Because that’s a different conversation and one I’m not interested in.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because republicans control the house. And the media is currently coddling trump. Unless some rogue republicans get onboard, there’s really no point in attempting to impeach him again. Until Dems can gain a majority.

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but that never stopped previous presidents from being impeachment attempts.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, but like I just said. There’s no point in even doing it without a majority. All 3 past impeached presidents had a majority in Congress favoring the opposition party.

Every minority party impeachment attempt has failed, quickly. Just like MTG on Biden’s 1st week as president, it went nowhere and was performative. Dems simply DONT HAVE THE VOTES TO IMPEACH TRUMP!

[–] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 0 points 2 days ago

You don’t have to have the votes to try. The point is the statement.

I think the topic might be flying above most people’s heads.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pre Trump, presidents feared impeachment and the media treated it almost like they were being sentenced to death. Even though you still need 2/3 of the senate for removal after impeachment.

Nixon literally resigned in shame over JUST an impeachment, granted, the GOP was much more bipartisan back then and might have voted for removal now.

Today, the GOP are just complete cucks to MAGA and Trump knows they’ll save him.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Republicans have no shame left

So impeachment isn't a viable strategy to oust them

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which sucks, because Watergate looks like child’s play compared to the numerous crimes and scandals our CONVICTED FELON President has done.

What do you suggest to be done. My only realistic suggestion is to win the midterms, the house specifically, the 2026 map favors the GOP. Block EVERYTHING from trump, even if it’s good, lame duck him, take the heat when the media attacks the Dems, and don’t cave until trump shows evidence of the Epstein Files and evidence that the 2028 election will be fair, no more purged votes. And even then, just lie to em and still not pass shit.

That’s pretty crazy though, the soldiers still gotta get paid.

Trump dosent fear impeachment and Dems don’t have the votes to remove him anyways.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How did Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, Stalin leave power?

That's probably what's going to do Trump in

[–] adb@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Democracy isn’t just about what (a short) majority of the voters have decided, it’s also about checks and balances, and protection of the individual, especially those from minority groups… and a lot more. There is nothing democratic about Trump’s rule and the fact that 52 or 53 or whatever percent of those citizens who went to actually cast a ballot voted for this doesn’t change that fact

Edit: Also, a general strike is not going to « tank the economy »

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 days ago

It wasn’t even a majority. 49%.

A just system doesn’t appoint a king this way.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

How would a general strike be neutral or positive for the economy?

General strikes have to involve a meaningful percentage of the working population and are only supposed to end when the demands are met. The people on strike stop working, reduce spending as much as possible and stop paying tax.

It's hard to imagine a scenario where that wouldn't affect it massively in a negative way, so I'm genuinely curious as to what you think would happen in that scenario

Edit: I'm not sure I understand why this has been met with downvotes and no comment? I don't see how I'm saying anything false here

Unless it's a misunderstanding that I'm saying people should not do a general strike, which couldn't be more wrong. Tbf I think Americans should have started one long before this point.

Hurting the economy in a sustained manner is the mechanism through which general strikes are an effective tool of the working class

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I think people don't understand that a general strike is an ongoing shutdown. They think it's like going on a march one Sunday afternoon.
Also, a general strike while hurting the billionaires, would also hurt the people and more so democrat supporting urban areas - to the point where many people would have no food. The billionaires could wait it out (they won't starve), and the fascist federal forces would come down hard on the eventual riots.