this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
602 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

4064 readers
32 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
602
GrapheneOS is finally ready to break free from Pixels, and it may never look back (www.androidauthority.com)
submitted 1 week ago by who@feddit.org to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Biggest challenge GOS has is that most hardware vendors do not meet their fairly restrictive hardware security requirements, and those few that do don't typically allow bootloader unlocking. Pixel devices up until now have been unicorns in those regards.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But I don't get why they insist on those requirements. Yes, Random Phone + Graphene is less secure than Pixel + Graphene, but still far more secure and private than Random Phone + Stock ROM. Insisting on having all features just makes it far less accessible. There are many regions and classes that can't buy supported phones or a new phone at all. And I can't even properly confirm that everything I want to use works on graphene, because I'd need to fully commit towards buying a phone first. Which, even used, costs a lot.

[–] 1XEVW3Y07@reddthat.com 15 points 1 week ago

It's a limited development pool, and they focus on delivering the most secure mobile OS possible, within the constraints that their funding and resources allow.

There are other ROMS, such as CalyxOS that have expanded to a few other devices, and LineageOS which has even broader support.

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

According to the FAQ (warning: very wordy):

The goal of the project is not to slightly improve some aspects of insecure devices and supporting a broad set of devices would be directly counter to the values of the project.

The expectation is for people to buy a secure device meeting our requirements to run GrapheneOS. Broad device support would imply mainly supporting very badly secured devices unable to support our features. It would also take a substantial amount of resources away from our work on privacy and security, especially since a lot of it is closely tied to the hardware such as the USB-C port control and fixing or working around memory corruption bugs uncovered by our features.