this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
611 points (98.7% liked)
LinkedinLunatics
5609 readers
42 users here now
A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com
(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
When the battery runs out, you pull over and "pedal" to recharge the battery, then you're good to go again!
now that is genius!
I don't own one of these, but that sounds actually useful if for example I'm about to climb a big hill and want to pedal at a less strenuous pace (but for more time) than would be needed to overcome the slope.
Assisted modes already exist, and regenerative braking already exist
But this joke is more funny :)
But do e-bikes have regenerative braking? I haven't seen that. I've been thinking that it would just be too heavy and clunky to be worth it.
Too heavy? You just run the motor in reverse which turns it into a generator and adds friction to do generative braking. There really isn't any added weight.
Bikes normally have freehubs, a ratchet on the cassette (sprockets) of the rear wheel, when you stop pedalling the bike freewheels, without that the pedals would keep turning.
This makes driving a motor from the wheel impossible without heavily modifying the normal bike mechanics. That's why regenerative braking on e bikes is rare.
Not if you have a hub motor. Those don't interact with the gear system at all.
Yup, which is also why they're really hard to pedal if the battery dies.
Only very cheap e-bikes have hub motors. They're not a good idea precisely because they don't interact with the gearing system. So you lose that functionality.
It's not worth losing access to gearing just to get regenerative braking because the amount of power being used isn't worth trying to recoup.
It needs a direct drive which is more weight than the other systems
Why would it need a direct drive? A mid drive can do the same thing they just don't usually since you'd need to gear for it. direct drives are the most efficient at regenerative braking but they aren't the only type.
Freewheel hub would prevent it.
You would need to put the freewheel between the motor and the pedals, and have an always-spinning chain/shaft
Could be done, perhaps, with significant added complexity (and hence maintenance). In practice it is not, to my knowledge there are no mid-mount regenerative system on the market. It is worth noting that mid-mounts are significantly more efficient than hub mount, enough so that even compared to hub mounts with regeneration, mid-mounts have more range for a given battery / wattage. The vast majority of hub mounts also do not implement regeneration.
You can find YouTube videos of people experimenting with flywheel-based regenerative braking. They're completely impractical but pretty funny to see.
Motors are generators when run inversely:
Motors = put in power to get rotational movement
Generators = put in rotational movement to get power
You already have the heaviest parts on the ebike - motor and battery, just need some capacitors and charging circuit board which are light and not too big.
Cheap electric bikes I've ridden with regen breaking slow you down quite a bit.
It's not difficult to get regenerative braking on a bike it's just difficult to get regenerative braking on a bike that's any good. Hub mounted motors are the least efficient type of motor because it's just directly driving the wheel at whatever speed it can output, with no access to gear ratios. E-bikes that forgo generative breaking in favour of a more efficient motor designs achieve better speeds for any given amount of power usage.
So yeah you can absolutely do it. But it's not a good idea for reasons that have nothing to do with the weight.
It's like 3-15% energy reclaimed, not efficient
Yes, but is it possible to pedal and use regen breaking to recharge the battery when stationary? It does work like that in my car (plug-in hybrid) but I don't know if e-bikes are the same way.
The traditional method of pedaling uphill less strenuously is to drop to a lower gear. You might go slower, but I'd bet even on existing e-bikes with pedal assist, this is something that's already pretty reasonable now days.
Gears
That's what gearing is for (you just go up the hill slower), but I can see the benefit to not being on the road.
Sure, but there are limits. One needs a certain amount of forward speed to maintain balance easily, and there's a maximum speed that can be reasonably pedaled. If the hill is steep enough then in my experience reducing the gearing enough to make pedaling not too strenuous runs into the other two limits. If an e-bike can have a low battery topped off before the hill starts, then pedal-assist (at least) would take care of the need to lower the gear while going up it.
If you need a minimum speed to maintain balance, how are you going to pedal while stationary?
Better to have active regeneration, where you pedal a bit harder on flats to top up the battery for hills.
Kickstand, holding a fence, etc. That active Regen thing sounds great, if I buy one of these I'll make sure it can do it.
Not true. One just needs to practice static balance. It's a great skill to have so everyone should learn how to do it.
Also you can use the lowest gear going almost a walking pace and climb up really steep hills. That's how we do it on MTBs. It also requires practice and good balance.
Ah, that would be a nice skill. I might even be better equipped for it now than when I was young because I've gotten into roller skating and improved my balance that way.
Incredible comment.