this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
183 points (98.9% liked)

News

32842 readers
2878 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If the government shutdown continues into November, about 42 million low-income people could face severe disruptions to their food stamp benefits, the Agriculture Department warned in a letter to state agencies last week, saying that the federal government would have “insufficient funds.”

More than a dozen states have since warned that food stamp recipients may experience significant delays in obtaining benefits next month, see their aid reduced or not receive assistance at all.

The letter, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, said that the Agriculture Department’s Food and Nutrition Service (...) directed state agencies to pause sending vendors the electronic files typically used to load the benefits for November.

“We’re going to run out of money in two weeks,” Brooke L. Rollins, the agriculture secretary, told reporters at the White House on Thursday. “So you’re talking about millions and millions of vulnerable families, of hungry families that are not going to have access to these programs because of this shutdown.”

(...)

Nearly 42 million people participated in the food stamp program in May, the month with the latest available data. They received an average of $188, at a total cost of about $8 billion.


Tried my best to summarize down to most direct and pertinent facts via cutting out with (...) elipsis, but also, here's the whole text in case NYT paywalls you:

Entire Article Text:

If the government shutdown continues into November, about 42 million low-income people could face severe disruptions to their food stamp benefits, the Agriculture Department warned in a letter to state agencies last week, saying that the federal government would have “insufficient funds.”

More than a dozen states have since warned that food stamp recipients may experience significant delays in obtaining benefits next month, see their aid reduced or not receive assistance at all.

The letter, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times, said that the Agriculture Department’s Food and Nutrition Service, which operates the food stamp program, known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, was exploring contingency plans. But it directed state agencies to pause sending vendors the electronic files typically used to load the benefits for November.

“We’re going to run out of money in two weeks,” Brooke L. Rollins, the agriculture secretary, told reporters at the White House on Thursday. “So you’re talking about millions and millions of vulnerable families, of hungry families that are not going to have access to these programs because of this shutdown.”

In a statement, a White House official said that Democrats “chose to shut down the government knowing that programs like SNAP would soon run out of funds.”

Such a disruption would be the first in recent decades. Benefits have remained available through every shutdown in the last 20 years, said Carolyn Vega, the associate director of policy analysis for Share Our Strength, a nonprofit that supports antipoverty programs.

“We are in uncharted territory,” she said.

Nearly 42 million people participated in the food stamp program in May, the month with the latest available data. They received an average of $188, at a total cost of about $8 billion.

Nutrition policy experts pointed to several other funding sources for the food stamp program, and noted that the Agriculture Department could also provide partial benefits for November. The agency could tap into a contingency fund of about $6 billion, but that would still fall short of covering full benefits for the month.

To fund a federal nutrition program for mothers and children known as WIC, the Trump administration used money collected from customs duties. It is possible that the Agriculture Department could use that same source, known as Section 32, but the account is largely used for school lunch and other child nutrition programs, and is unlikely to be sufficient to fund both food stamps and WIC.

The agency also has regulations on how to reduce benefits based on need and household size. For example, higher-income families could see their November benefits reduced by a larger percentage than lower-income ones.

The Agriculture Department could also turn to a specific interpretation of existing law to justify continuing to fund food stamps, said David A. Super, a law professor at Georgetown University. Under that theory, food stamps are an entitlement program, like Medicare, that is not subject to the annual appropriations process.

“The simplest approach for the U.S.D.A. would be to recognize that language in the Food and Nutrition Act makes SNAP an entitlement independent of appropriations, and continue paying benefits on the strength of that language,” Mr. Super said.

Several states, such as Illinois and New York, have already stated that they cannot provide funding from their own coffers. And at least one state is already warning that October benefits, too, may be affected. Minnesota’s Department of Children, Youth and Families said on Friday that it could not guarantee the availability of benefits before Nov. 1 for new enrollees.

Still, Ms. Vega cautioned against panicking, emphasizing that eligible people should still apply. She called for more clarity and a quick resolution from officials in Washington.

“While a delay is certainly better than not issuing November benefits at all, even that can be really significant to a family that is counting on that money and already has a tight budget,” she said.


So uh yeah, ~42 million people set to start starving in about two weeks... uh... good luck everyone!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“45% of program recipients voted, compared with 84% of nonrecipients. Public benefits recipients were thus over 20% of the voting-eligible population but only 12% of voters.”

Hey, remember that time when you didn’t get your Snap benefits? Do you plan to vote this next election? Don’t expect things to change unless you make an effort to change them.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10780874231191703#%3A%7E%3Atext=Abstract%2Cbut+only+12%25+of+voters.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not saying this is the entire problem, but we need universal vote-by-mail and/or to make election day a federal holiday. Low-income folks have the least leeway to miss work to vote, and from what I understand many poorer areas are underserved in terms of polling locations.