JonsJava

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm too thick skinned too let this get to me.

Having 5 kids will do that

Have fun.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I mean, we're big boys, with our big boy pants and all!

Let's see how they respond when they can't unnerve us...

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I agree. The mods here are idiots.

For example, we reversed this ban.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You hit it on the head. We weren't aware of this user, as we had 0 reports about them until today.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

By the time we received complaints about your comments, the user in question (cat) had already deleted their account.

I don't have time to track down every post of theirs to check for sources. We tend to do that when people report posts.

The post that was reported that was submitted by cat was this one:

https://a.lemmy.world/lemmy.world/post/25907073

Nothing wrong with that post. The reason given in the report:

WTF is this power user stuff? That's a lot of freaking posts in less than a month

Again, prolific posting isn't against any rule. The post didn't break any rule. Why would I remove that?

Now, on to the reason I gave a temp ban.

Comment:


What the actual fuck? My entire goddamn feed is this one account…

Attacking the user for posting? You may not like them, but again, we only received one report on that user. Apparently their content, while aggressive, broke no rules, and upset nobody until today, according to my reports and mod logs.

Next:

Touch grass. Good lord. You’re carpet bombing multiple communities with repeats of the same crap.

Another personal attack against the user.

Next:

I’m not blocking an account that could easily pivot and start blasting multiple communities spanning multiple instances with subversive information.

Much better to bring awareness to such ridiculousness. The motives of an account with such activity should be questioned. ESPECIALLY since all posts are in news and politics communities.

Another person attacking them for posting. Do we attack Flying Squid, Admiral Picard, MicroWave, or others for contributing more than other users? Again, they broke no rules, and we received our first complaint about that account today.

There were a lot of people attacking that user, and a lot of reports on the comments attacking that user. Those are just a few examples.

Yes, I moderate, but I have a ton more going on in my life, so I'm not always on Lemmy to see what's happening, and I do rely heavily on reports to find points of pain in the communities I moderate. I also rely heavily on the rest of the moderation team, as well the great tools that people like @ptz@dubvee.org make.

If you go through the posts in this community, you'll see tons of places where I personally have worked with other users who had complaints. We try to be fair, but attacking users is a violation of our community rules.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Please, make this. I have too many communities, or I would

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

You're both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

"I never consent to searches"

"I don't answer questions. Am I detained, or am I free to leave?"

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Caught me on my lunch break, and this is a community I love lurking in.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Fair point. I'll restore the comments and remove the ban

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I was the one that submitted the ban, after a number of reports. On the face of it (I am at work, so don't always have time to deep dive), The reports did seem to align with trolling.

I had/have no idea what's going on withe the Jordan Lund thing.

 

A woman named Laura McCaskill used an Apple AirTag to track down her stolen Harris/Walz campaign sign, which led her to a home in Nixa, Missouri. When confronted, the young man's mother admitted that the signs in the trunk of the car belonged to her son, who she described as "just an idiot."

The incident involved the theft of around 60 signs from various homes in the neighborhood. McCaskill and other residents plan to file police reports, and McCaskill expressed concern about the entitlement and lack of accountability shown by the young man and his mother. The document also discusses the legal implications of stealing campaign signs, referencing Missouri Statute 115.637 which classifies such actions as a misdemeanor offense.

7
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by JonsJava@lemmy.world to c/gaming@lemmy.world
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19612227

Hello world!

as the title says the server is BACK! It is hosted under a new server! The same map and your inventory is the same!

Domain is the same: minecraft.lemmy.world

Bedrock: minecraft.lemmy.world:1027

Please note: The new server is hosted in the USA so if you are joining from the EU please expect higher than before ping! This can not be avoided as the generous hoster doesnt have a server in the EU.

The generous hoster is @JonsJava@lemmy.world, thanks to him all this is possible.

The home limits are increased and there will be for everyone who wants it a new spawn where you can build from.

Thanks everyone
Rooki

 

Please post articles related to the debate here. New posts about the debate will be removed as duplicates.

Discussions are welcome and encouraged!

 

The news mod team has asked to no longer be a part of the project until we have a composite tool that polls multiple sources for a more balanced view.

It will take a few hours, but FOR NOW there won't be a bot giving reviews of the source.

The goal was simple: make it easier to show biased sources. This was to give you and the mods a better view of what we were looking at.

The mod team is in agreement: one source of truth isn't enough. We are working on a tool to give a composite score, from multiple sources, all open source.

view more: next ›