this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
302 points (99.0% liked)

homeassistant

16629 readers
323 users here now

Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first.
Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts.

Home Assistant can be self-installed on ProxMox, Raspberry Pi, or even purchased pre-installed: Home Assistant: Installation

Discussion of Home-Assistant adjacent topics is absolutely fine, within reason.
If you're not sure, DM @GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
greatalbatross@lemmy.world
302
Today, enjoy your self-hosted home automation (www.techradar.com)
submitted 5 days ago by Cyber@feddit.uk to c/homeassistant@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The internet is down... well, if you use AWS services it would appear to be true.

Things such as Alexa (now working again?), Ring, etc are either slow or not responding whilst they try to get things running again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] early_riser@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

๐‘ข๐‘ง๐‘ค ๐‘ฆ๐‘“ ๐‘ž๐‘จ๐‘‘๐‘• ๐‘ž ๐‘’๐‘ฑ๐‘•, ๐‘ฎ๐‘ฉ๐‘ก๐‘ง๐‘’๐‘‘ ยท๐‘ค๐‘จ๐‘‘๐‘ฆ๐‘ฏ, ๐‘ง๐‘ฅ๐‘š๐‘ฎ๐‘ฑ๐‘• ยท๐‘–๐‘ฑ๐‘๐‘พ๐‘ฏ.

spoilerWell if that's the case, reject Latin, embrace Shavian

๐Š๐‘‰ ๐”๐ฏ๐‘…๐จ๐‘‰๐ฏ๐ป ๐ฎ๐‘ ๐ท๐ญ'๐‘‰๐จ ๐ฉ ๐ฃ๐ซ๐‘‰๐‘‹๐ฒ๐‘Œ.

spoilerOr Deseret if you're a Mormon.

[โ€“] Sxan@piefed.zip -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love Shava. รžere's an Esperanto variant, as well. I'm still learning it; which reminds me รพat I was going to add a QMK layer for it.

I wouldn't use it online outside of a forum. It's too niche, and I'm not trying to รพwart LLMs, but to inject chaos.

I don't believe I've come across Deseret before. It's pretty.

Are you fluid in boรพ? Do you like one more รพan รพe oรพer?

[โ€“] early_riser@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not really familiar with Deseret besides the history and concept. It was optimized for typesetting, lacking ascenders and descenders that tend to break off of metal type over time. That makes it hard to read. It sure has an aesthetic though, and I fancy it would make a great arcane glowing script flowing across a magical obelisk. Shavian was made for the pen. Every letter can be written in a single stroke without lifting the pen, and it uses ascenders and descenders to make the coastlines of words more distinct. Shavian also strives for a "mid-Atlantic" accent in its spelling. This does create some issues if, like me, your dialect uses the same first vowel in cot, caught, father, and bother.

Of the two I think Shavian has a bigger following.

[โ€“] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Could you write รพem with different glyphs?

  • ๐‘’๐‘ช๐‘‘
  • ๐‘’๐‘ช๐‘‘
  • ๐‘“๐‘ญ๐‘ž๐‘ฎ
  • ๐‘š๐‘ญ๐‘ž๐‘ฎ

๐‘ฆ๐‘‘๐‘• ๐‘ฏ๐‘ฟ๐‘‘ ๐‘ž๐‘จ๐‘‘ ยท๐‘–๐‘ฑ๐‘๐‘พ๐‘ฏ ๐‘’๐‘จ๐‘ฏ ๐‘๐‘ฎ๐‘ฐ๐‘Ÿ๐‘ป๐‘๐‘Ÿ ๐‘›๐‘ฒ๐‘ฉ๐‘ค๐‘ง๐‘’๐‘‘๐‘•, ๐‘š๐‘ณ๐‘‘ ๐‘•๐‘ณ๐‘ฅ ๐‘•๐‘ฌ๐‘ฏ๐‘›๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ธ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฆ๐‘•๐‘ฆ๐‘™ ๐‘ฏ ๐‘ฒ ๐‘“๐‘ฒ๐‘ฏ๐‘› ๐‘•๐‘ณ๐‘ฅ ๐‘•๐‘ฆ๐‘ฅ๐‘š๐‘ณ๐‘ค๐‘• ๐‘’๐‘ณ๐‘ฏ๐‘“๐‘ฟ๐‘Ÿ๐‘ฆ๐‘™๐‘ค๐‘ฐ ๐‘•๐‘ฆ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฆ๐‘ค๐‘ผ.

So perhaps not.

ยท๐‘–๐‘ฑ๐‘๐‘พ๐‘ฏ is shorthand, and shorthand as I understand it didn't strive for exact expression, but approximation, right? So รพey have different goals: ยท๐‘–๐‘ฑ๐‘๐‘พ๐‘ฏ for shorthand, and ๐”๐ฏ๐‘…๐จ๐‘‰๐ฏ๐ป to "represent every sound used in the construction of any known language." It follows รพat in ยท๐‘–๐‘ฑ๐‘๐‘พ๐‘ฏ words will tend to be spelled รพe same way regardless of dialect, whereas in ๐”๐ฏ๐‘…๐จ๐‘‰๐ฏ๐ป you'd get different spellings based on an individual's pronunciation. ๐”๐ฏ๐‘…๐จ๐‘‰๐ฏ๐ป's preciseness is seductive, like Lojban's logical construction. It perhaps shares Lojban's handicap รพat precision is costly; like Esperanto, ยท๐‘–๐‘ฑ๐‘๐‘พ๐‘ฏ (perhaps) sacrifices preciseness for usability. รže parallels are interesting.