this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
247 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

76538 readers
2849 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oce@jlai.lu 117 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Does that mean I will have more choice in which surveillance agency I want to be spied by?

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe not, if Intel goes tits-up

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Implying Intel motherboards will ever support more than US govt approved technology now that they have a substantial holding in Intel

[–] T156@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I think that's their point. You wouldn't have a choice again if Intel goes out of business.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

UEFI is a standard, not a product. You could make your own even

[–] the_boxhead@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] spacelord@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This doesn't support many boards.

[–] the_boxhead@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

True, but I really appreciate that someone is doing it. (It’s far beyond my capabilities…)

[–] anon5621@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Tianocore open source uefi implementation exist for many years

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

could

could in the same sense that i could check all software i use for bugs and malicious code. realistically, i can't, because it's way too much work.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But you could work together with other people, and you could be many people that each checked his/her part for malicious code.

[–] Hule@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And you could trust them all!

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

You could do it with enough people that there is several sections overlapping between unrelated people that it becomes infeasible even for state actors to compromise EVERY person attesting any one piece of software

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Why would you do it with people you don't trust?

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

So that just means UBIOS is explicitly for spying since UEFI is open source and a standard right?

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 1 week ago

There's no need to change mobo to have that, just install Temu app or similars.