this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
262 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

13644 readers
235 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They don’t understand probability

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The per 100,000 is pretty standard for per capita

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Although saying per capita here would be misleading, because it's not like those people ride the subway 500 times AND drives a car everywhere. The ones who take the subway are the only ones at risk of subway homocide, the ones who drive are actually less likely to die in a traffic accident than people outside of their car like pedestrians and bikers, and the two groups probably are much different in size.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah but I don't understand how it would combine with the 500 rides. Were they counting only people who rode 500 times a year? Or is the implication that for this line they didn't go by 100000 people, but instead by 500 rides? That would make it incomparable. I just don't get it

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Oh I had to go back to see what you were referring to with the 500 rides thing... Maybe that's the sample size for NYC?