this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
215 points (86.7% liked)

politics

26203 readers
2542 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Feel this is a good accompanying piece for all the folk insisting on caping for a Blackwater merc wth a nazi tattoo because he said something they liked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I mean it's likely him or Collins. I'll take the devil I don't know.

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The election is one year away and over six months until registration for the primary ends. There is zero reason to stick with someone that has this many red flags. If he manages to win the primary, he will all but guarantee another Collins victory, because its real easy to write attack ads against this guy.

You know how Bernicrats always get smeared as being low key bigots? This doesn’t help with that image. I have seen multiple POC and jewish people on bluesky lamenting the fact that Bernie’s supporters are known for purity tests, but the cis-white male with a nazi tattoo gets a pass. That’s the image that is being conveyed to the public at large. There’s just no way to come back from having a nazi tattoo when running as a democrat in this day and age. And ‘I got it covered up once everyone found out’ is not an answer that is going to fly for the majority of people out there.

This isn’t the DNC going against him, Ken Martin supports him, Bernie still endorses him, he was all over CNN like a month ago as the exciting outsider oysterman who tells it like it is. And then it came out he has a nazi tattoo. So much of the general public turned on him. Some reporter said that when polling dem senators about it, they all said the tattoo wasn’t an issue, and still think he’s good for engagement. It isn’t them going against him, and most news articles are still going soft on him, and using his phrasing to describe it. But the general public hears nazi tattoo and, rightfully, wants nothing to do with him.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

You know how Bernicrats always get smeared as being low key bigots?

I've often noticed this.

Ignoring the part that is obvious psyops being directed at the left, it seems like some people think that if you focus on issues of class primarily and don't constantly harp on issues of identity instead, that makes someone a "bigot". I think that's how the thinking goes, but what the people with the hyper-focus on "intersectionality" seem to be missing is that this kind of hair-splitting is exactly the tactic the elites employ to divide everyone up...and some of these scolds seem to be doing everything exactly as the elites would want them to go about it...

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The fact of the matter is Bernie has always been weak on race issues. He botched the BLM protests in 2016 and has never had sufficient outreach to the Black community. I don’t think he’s a bigot at all, but he doesn’t seem to understand that there is more than class war. To dismiss the concerns of the Black community in America as being just part of a larger class war is incredibly insensitive. All classes of white people have marginalized POC in this country repeatedly throughout its history.

I love Bernie, but this is a major flaw of his. In 2016 it was somewhat understandable as he is from Vermont and was kinda blindsided by everything, but he still has not progressed on this issue and I don’t think either he or enough of his supporters get how off-putting it is to these communities.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

At the end of the day? Sanders is a rich, privileged, 84-year old white male. And he has been a professional politician for almost half his life.

Sanders argues for class politics and fucking good for him. But he ignores race and identity because... that hasn't been a concern for him in closer to 60 years than not. Same with his LONG track record of shitty views on immigration: American Leftists (also other countries) kinda were actively opposed to immigration up until fairly recently as it was largely viewed as a way to bring in cheap labor to take away American jobs (and... it kinda was....).

But what that results in is that we have an 84 year old man who thinks he still is living in the 1970s and 1980s... in the 2020s. And now that he finally has a platform after literally being the meme about how nobody gives a shit about white guys talking on CSPAN... he is rapidly becoming an example of why it is ALWAYS shut the fuck up Friday and it maybe is time for grandpa to step down.

But the problem is that so many people have decided he is the only hope for "socialism" in the world and are insisting that any shitty thing he does isn't a symptom of being old as fuck but is actually some deeply intelligent 4-d chess. Which is why "h1b visas are bad" is such a "both sides" talking point and so forth.


Think about it this way: You are going to the store to buy some bulk food. Let's say kidney beans. You grab the scooper, try not to think about who the last person who used it was, and then dump a scoop or four into your bag. You eyeball it to make sure nothing looks overly bad, but you aren't going to individually check each bean. You'll just dump them in water and see which are the bad floaters. It is less than a few pennies worth of lost food so whatever.

Good on you. You are privileged. Most of us are.

Now understand there are people in the world who can't do that. They actually have to very slowly add the loose beans to their bag because a lot of them ARE rotten or overly damaged.

It isn't an inherent flaw that you or I don't check each individual bean. But it also means that we don't have the perspective to advocate for those who need to.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dawg, he's got a Nazi tattoo. My non-white ass is done with him.

Demand better of your representatives.

[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No, no, no, but don't you see? We're the ones stopping labor progress by being concerned about what happens to our communities~ And, of course, communities of color have never been behind progresses of labor rights while focusing on issues of race (as if they don't often go hand-in-hand)~

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

It is over a year until the election. There are multiple primary candidates. Maybe we should look a bit farther than the nazi who joined Blackwater after hanging out at Abu Ghraib