this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
728 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26173 readers
3825 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is facing legal action over the demolition of the White House’s East Wing, part of a $300 million plan to build a new ballroom on the executive grounds.

A Virginia couple, Charles and Judith Voorhees, filed an emergency motion in federal court on October 23 seeking to halt the project, alleging that it violates multiple federal preservation and planning laws.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Azki25@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The founding fathers would be turning in their graves. This time line is fked man. He's going to rig the next election if he doesn't get rid of elections all together. One thing he doesn't realise is dictatorships like RUS and China have unarmed controlled citizens.

The USA has the most heavily armed population on the planet.

He's fucking with fire and he is absolutely going to be burnt.

Bro just bulldozed history for a ball room.... Insanity.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And yet you’d think with the whole right to bear arms and use it against kings would have kicked in already tho.

They still just use the guns on children and minorities.

This has been the most anticlimactic flex I’ve ever seen.

We will not be forgetting this one should another gun toting citizen from the US boast their reasons of the constitution.

Prepare to have this thrown in all the faces for generations to come.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

I am still waiting for Americans to use their guns to rise up against tyranny instead of using them to shoot minorities

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

The most American thing to say. When they are really cowards holding onto their guns cause they're scared.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In an all out war, (which I doubt will happen) all these guns in the population don't matter against drones, aircrafts, tanks and trained snipers or other soldiers. If the military and all other agencies decides to support Trump, all these weapons will be useless. The pentagon surely has plans for a civil uprising in their own country.

I don't think the US has enough ordinary citizen that would actually risk their lives for democracy, to make a difference. Media and social media is controlled by the oligarchy, and even the progressives don't seem to want to cut themselves loose of twitter, Facebook/Whatsapp, google, bluesky, discord and so on. Where would they even organize?

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well the citizens of Afganistán and Vietnam proved this wrong. Never underestimate guerrilla warfare

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sure, but we are talking about the US here.

Or are you all busy building tunnels and bunkers over there? Organise in your neighborhood and build local groups?

Pretty sure that if the media starts calling these guerrillas terrorists, anti-american, instigators of violence, Communists, Antifa, and so on, they will loose public support and without broad local support in the population, guerilla fighting will not work.

Afganistán and Vietnam fought guerilla against a foreign invasion. US would have to fight 'guerilla' against their neighbors and other Americans, against people like them... I don't think this is comparable.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago

Implying the national guard and now heavily armed PDs of all the states support the federal coup, and don't instead go full guerilla

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Bro just bulldozed history for a ball room… Insanity.

THRONE room!

[–] PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How much of that heavily armed population are Trump supporters though?

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not as many as there'd need to be.

[–] PhilMcGraw@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully we won't find out. Feel like there's heavily tilted scale towards Trump/republicans when it comes to gun ownership as the other side tends to be more for restricting gun ownership.

[–] Ceruleum@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

Those are the optics, but is it true?