this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
660 points (97.0% liked)

science

22259 readers
294 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That doesn’t make it pointless.

There is something to be learned from this. Using a control would answer a different question.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Using a control group would tell us if there's any gain from the supplements whatsoever, was basically my point. For the average person using supplements doesn't do much for weight gain as far as I hear, so that's why I was asking what kind of people these subjects were, if they were athletes or regular people doing weight training. So, it does matter.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And, my point is that calling this research pointless is just wrong because it answers à different question.

I’m not disagreeing that the question that you want answered should be studied. It should. But, the fact that this research doesn’t answer your question doesn’t make it pointless.

It’s perfectly valid research to study whether the results are different between animal-based and plant-based supplements. I didn’t go through the citations but they say:

Recent evidence suggests that both animal and plant proteins support strength and hypertrophy gains when paired with resistance training and adequate protein intake

which sounds like the research you’re asking for has already been done.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Alright, valid points from both sides. 🤝