this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
92 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

10596 readers
670 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Across Canada, real estate developers and big corporate landlords are systematically exploiting racialized communities, buying up properties where they live at low prices and then flipping them for profit—after evicting long-term residents.

A new report, obtained exclusively by The Breach, shows that this practice is not incidental but a nationwide tactic employed by “financialized landlords.” These are entities like real estate investment trusts (REITs), asset managers, and pension funds that treat rental housing as an investment to generate shareholder profits, rather than a place for people to live.

The strategy hinges on a discriminatory and cynical assumption: removing Black and Arab tenants reliably raises property values and unlocks new profits.

These landlords methodically target buildings with low rents and long-standing, mostly immigrant tenants. Through capital upgrades, neglect, or renovation-driven evictions—what the industry euphemistically calls “repositioning”—they displace current residents and convert the housing into higher-value assets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DiscussionBear@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

But forcing people into homelessness and potentially fast tracking them deeper into poverty isnt low? Pretty fucked up if you ask me.

This behavior is just as bad if not worse than a simple death threat. These landlords and corporations could potentially lead to untold damage to society and way more deaths than just one landlord.

They can get fucked.

[–] orioler25@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

It is worse, they can threaten people with the confidence that the police and law will defend them before the people they target. People have defended themselves against landlords in the past, landlords today enjoy more security than they used to.