this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
230 points (97.1% liked)

politics

26203 readers
2650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Joe Biden experienced such “cognitive decline” while in office that it remains a serious question as to whether he was aware of the substance of the various pardons and commutations signed in his name via autopen, the GOP-controlled House Oversight Committee asserted in a letter it sent to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging her to consider whether that clemency might be invalid and to take action for potential prosecution against some of Biden’s aides.

The committee “deems void President Biden’s executive actions that were signed using the Autopen, and the committee determines that action by the Department of Justice is warranted to address the legal consequences of that determination,” it wrote to Bondi released Tuesday morning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 73 points 2 days ago (29 children)

Look at this obvious bullshit and gasp.

Biden knew the Nazis would eventually come for his family. This is exactly why he pardoned them (for the bullshit charges) from the GQP before leaving office.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (28 children)

Maybe...

Just maybe...

Biden should have held trump and co accountable for all the illegal shit they did his first term, instead of ignoring it to avoid setting the precedent a president could ever be accountable for breaking the law in office?

Biden chose not to do that. Despite all the harm it would cause the country and all of us

Instead he did some last minute pardons for his own family and left 99.999999% of Americans in the wind.

Now trump is going to set the precedent of holding past presidents accountable, and he's going to do a bad job of it, and Biden and his family will have to pay a price

If Biden would have done what's best for America, he never would have had to do those bullshit pardons to begin with

All my thoughts and prayers...

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The issue was the amount of illegal shit they did, that resulted in the various proceedings. The discovery for all the crimes went on too long, and as you've seen from the lawsuits that were thrown out... it's not wise to start one without rock solid evidence and a fully built case.

On the other hand the moment SCOTUS ruled that any official act of POTUS is fully legal, regardless of technical legality, he should've had Trump shot. Period.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The issue was the amount of illegal shit they did, that resulted in the various proceedings. The discovery for all the crimes went on too long, and as you’ve seen from the lawsuits that were thrown out… it’s not wise to start one without rock solid evidence and a fully built case.

...

So pick one thing and focus on that...

For fucks sake this is basically life advice given to children:

Student:

I have too much homework, I'll never accomplish it all!

Teacher/parent:

Start with one assignment, and then move on to the next. That way you'll get some finished. Don't try to do every assignment at the same time or you might not get any done.

But if you're saying Biden and his admin we're too stupid to know that, I actually disagree.

I think they were doing the classic neoliberal move where they say they're "investigating" but then they just run down the clock and say "aww shucks, we ran out of time".

Because that's what he also did with: cannabis decriminalization, better healthcare, more social programs, justice reform, LGBTQ rights...

Basically, fucking everything.

But you're saying, that you believe Biden and his people, were just genuinely too stupid to focus on specific crimes and they couldn't build a case against trump for anything?

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A criminal investigation is a bit more complex topic than homework. You can't pick and choose the things, you need to conduct a thorough investigation uncovering every potentially relevant fact and building a case based on that. Miss evidence, miss a connection, and your case is thrown out during cross-examination. How do you think it sounds to a judge that oops, you didn't do this and that and that, investigating connected crimes etc., because you "wanted a quick conviction"?

Trump's crimes were incredibly inter-connected, and the court case wasn't to convince voters but to convince a judge.

Voters are convinced by even simple rumours, you don't even need an actual criminal investigation, just lie and spread the rumour that one is happening, and bam, you got a bunch of people now dead-set against whomever these made up investigations are happening of. That's how MAGA operates, that's how the whole Hunter Biden thing went on and frenzied half your country. Wild rumours until a fraction of what they were shouting materialised, and literally all they've got to show for it is his dick pics on the Senate and House floor... But the average MAGA was convinced and that was enough.

Do you think the reverse would be enough? Just dirty Trump until MAGA turns away? Frivolous lawsuits based on partial investigations? That would just further convince MAGA that it's a baseless, political witch-hunt.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You can’t pick and choose the things,

That is definitely not true in America where:

Our riminal justice system is overwhelmingly a system of pleas. Statistics consistently show that about 95-98% of federal convictions and 94-95% of state convictions result from guilty pleas, often through plea bargains. The Supreme Court acknowledged this reality in Missouri v. Frye, stating that our system “is for the most part a system of pleas, not a system of trials.”

https://govfacts.org/explainer/plea-bargain-vs-trial-navigating-the-crossroads-of-justice/

People almost exclusively are having their crimes "picked and chosen".

That's the entire basis of modern justice system.

You pull over a speeder and find a joint, the cop can just let it go. The prosecutor could decide to drop it. Multiple people at every step "pick and choose" before and after charges are filed...

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)