this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
230 points (97.1% liked)

politics

26203 readers
2650 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Joe Biden experienced such “cognitive decline” while in office that it remains a serious question as to whether he was aware of the substance of the various pardons and commutations signed in his name via autopen, the GOP-controlled House Oversight Committee asserted in a letter it sent to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging her to consider whether that clemency might be invalid and to take action for potential prosecution against some of Biden’s aides.

The committee “deems void President Biden’s executive actions that were signed using the Autopen, and the committee determines that action by the Department of Justice is warranted to address the legal consequences of that determination,” it wrote to Bondi released Tuesday morning.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 169 points 2 days ago (5 children)

So they are opening the door for voiding presidential pardons based on competency? That's going to be interesting in 3 years. I think conflict of interest could be considered just as compromising as cognitive decline. Could also have implications for Oliver North.

But also, the way Trump always claims he doesn't know anything about <that>, I would suggest he also is unaware of what is being done in his name, regardless of who holds the pen.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 days ago (13 children)

interesting in the way that the democrats will do nothing about it and then when the GOP gets back in they'll make it worse.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Old dems are ded dude. They didn’t do anything before and that was their MO … true.

But the reason they will do nothing about it in the future is that they’re ghosts, electoral echoes of cynical centrist complacency.

The new dems will be different simply because they clearly must be different to even win votes.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

God I hope you're right.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ya know, most countries don't give one person infinite get out of jail free cards.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We just value freedom here. ~revs big truck, slurps from 32oz diet soda~

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

32oz? Why did you get a small? It's diet!

[–] socsa@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

This won't go anywhere. There's plenty of public examples of Biden discussing the pardons. He's still lucid enough to testify if needed.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

If they're opening this box what makes you think they'd do it if they wouldn't still have power in 3 years? Everything they're doing they're doing like they're never gonna not be in power. We should all be paying attention to that.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Bold of you to assume that there will be a change of government in 3 yrs time....

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 98 points 2 days ago (3 children)

From the last time this was brought up, it had been pointed out that the courts have previously said that that presidential pardons do not even need to be written

A 2024 federal appeals court decision said a pardon doesn’t even have to be in writing. “The answer is undoubtedly no,” the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled. “The plain language of the Constitution imposes no such limit.”

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Actual legality doesn’t matter. It’s a pretext.

SCOTUS "Turns out pardons not signed by pen are void. However tthis only applies to President's not named Donald J. Trump. It's in the Consitution. No, you can't see the real consitution. The real consitution is in Canada for safe keeping."

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Not to mention that using ANY mark is considered a signature, no matter the method of affixing it to the document. It's an ADA compliance thing - you can't discriminate based on the method of signing.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Former President Joe Biden experienced such “cognitive decline” while in office that it remains a serious question as to whether he was aware of the substance of the various pardons and commutations signed in his name via autopen . . .

If you're going to make that claim, then there's no particular reason to bring up the autopen. He was either aware of what he was signing or he wasn't.

Naturally, they won't use the same argument on Trump despite far more evidence of cognitive decline.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

Trump is pardoning so many people it could be argued that the volume makes it unlikely he's "aware of the substance of the various pardons and commutations".

[–] socsa@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

As with anything else here, "auto pen" is one of the objects of aggrievement Trump's leaky puddle of a brain has clinged in to, and the handlers throw it in these memos to appease him. It's the exact same reason he is still ranting about the navy's catapults. I guarantee you that in private he does nothing but talk random times people have disagreed with him over the years.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 111 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cool so do the guy who pardoned 1500 insurrectionists and struggles on cognitive ability tests next.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly, let's see those 1500 signatures, I bet they are all exactly the same. No fucking way he signed 1500 pardons himself that fast.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think he signed a single blanket pardon, and not 1500 individual documents.

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That should be just as invalid as bidens then. It's too impersonal.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It should be invalid because it's super fucked up, but unfortunately the people decided that he should have the power to pardon whomever he wants of any crime.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

It should be invalid because Trump is a traitor illegally holding office in violation of the 14th amendment because he got to build the courts his first term and too many MFers in the states lack the competency to think.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 43 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

I had to look at the publication date on that article three times because I thought that there was no way he’s that stupid that he’s still saying this after he said it the first time years ago. Surely someone explained to him how magnets work by now, but nope, the article is from a few days ago, and he has again proven that his stupidity knows no bounds.

[–] A7thStone@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fucking magnets, how do they work? and I don't want to talk to a scientist, y'all motherfuckers lyin', and gettin' me pissed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 73 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Look at this obvious bullshit and gasp.

Biden knew the Nazis would eventually come for his family. This is exactly why he pardoned them (for the bullshit charges) from the GQP before leaving office.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Maybe...

Just maybe...

Biden should have held trump and co accountable for all the illegal shit they did his first term, instead of ignoring it to avoid setting the precedent a president could ever be accountable for breaking the law in office?

Biden chose not to do that. Despite all the harm it would cause the country and all of us

Instead he did some last minute pardons for his own family and left 99.999999% of Americans in the wind.

Now trump is going to set the precedent of holding past presidents accountable, and he's going to do a bad job of it, and Biden and his family will have to pay a price

If Biden would have done what's best for America, he never would have had to do those bullshit pardons to begin with

All my thoughts and prayers...

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 22 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I think these are two separate conversations.

You’re not wrong. Neither am I.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Biden, short of behaving like Trump (which the supreme court certainly would have found issue with) had no real power at any point to do any of that due to Republicans in Congress. He fucked up big with Comey and Mueller, we all should have known Republicans have no real integrity, but really there wasn't anything he could have done short of breaking the system dictator style like Trump is. Biden was behaving according to rules norms and laws. Republicans are unencumbered by such things. Based on your comment you do not have a great idea of how our federal government is actually supposed to function, and mostly did function before the tea party and maga.

Put the blame where it belongs, on every Republican voter and every both sides abstainer. The American people failed an open book test because they couldn't be fucked to have the most basic understanding of their own government. We're getting what we deserve.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do they really want to set this precedent?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Lol you expect the GOP to live up to a standard they place on other people? I thought the whole reason for being a Republican was to tell others what to do while trying to ignore the people as much as possible.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago

Lol they don't care, they don't follow precedent, that is one of the major reasons they are winning so decisively.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Such unrelenting assholes and bullshit.

A reminder: Do not let the bastards wear you down. Fight them at every step, be a thorn, be the sand in their gears, always.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 39 points 2 days ago

So now there's precedent to toss Trump's Nazi pardons back in prison. Cool

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So let's say they actually try to enforce this. How do they know which signatures are autopen and which aren't? They (the GOP) will probably just say they all were, but I can't imagine it holding up in court against any reasonable judge.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're presuming there would be a reasonable judge and not one already bought and paid for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

So if you ever get pardoned, flee the country.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

Man, these guys are such fucking losers

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I’m perfectly fine with this one. It gives America a second chance to undo all of Trump’s pardons.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 days ago (9 children)

more like another step in unravelling any and all of American government's legitimacy

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

It wasn’t too long ago when the US gave telecommunication companies retroactive immunity for spying on Americans. There are already way too many options for presidential immunity, pardons and commutations that are used to protect criminals from prosecution.

The GOP is already a full kleptocratic organization with zero intent to govern for the good of Americans.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

This is hanging chads all over again isn’t it?

load more comments
view more: next ›