this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
229 points (96.7% liked)

politics

26216 readers
2616 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Joe Biden experienced such “cognitive decline” while in office that it remains a serious question as to whether he was aware of the substance of the various pardons and commutations signed in his name via autopen, the GOP-controlled House Oversight Committee asserted in a letter it sent to Attorney General Pam Bondi, urging her to consider whether that clemency might be invalid and to take action for potential prosecution against some of Biden’s aides.

The committee “deems void President Biden’s executive actions that were signed using the Autopen, and the committee determines that action by the Department of Justice is warranted to address the legal consequences of that determination,” it wrote to Bondi released Tuesday morning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 170 points 2 days ago (5 children)

So they are opening the door for voiding presidential pardons based on competency? That's going to be interesting in 3 years. I think conflict of interest could be considered just as compromising as cognitive decline. Could also have implications for Oliver North.

But also, the way Trump always claims he doesn't know anything about <that>, I would suggest he also is unaware of what is being done in his name, regardless of who holds the pen.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

interesting in the way that the democrats will do nothing about it and then when the GOP gets back in they'll make it worse.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Old dems are ded dude. They didn’t do anything before and that was their MO … true.

But the reason they will do nothing about it in the future is that they’re ghosts, electoral echoes of cynical centrist complacency.

The new dems will be different simply because they clearly must be different to even win votes.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

God I hope you're right.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's interesting you think everything is just gonna continue on like normal. Republicans are never relinquishing power again. There will be no more Democratic party in three years.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"Never again" is a long time horizon to make predictions about something as volatile as politics.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

It's a fascist coup, not just "politics."

[–] Thassodar@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

People like you on Lemmy really annoy me, always negative about anything said about politics. Are you trying to kill hope? I honestly don't see what your comment adds to the discussion.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretending everything goes back to "normal" in 3 years doesn't add much either. Hope is fine, but without action is just delusion. Just voting isn't gonna cut it. People need to be aware and to prepare. Republicans will not relinquish power peacefully. They've done too much that will require accountability. They will not allow that, and they literally have a violent private army filled with violent offenders with a larger budget than the Marines, and they have seized the public coffers to ensure loyalty. This is all out in the open. Everything they are doing, they would not do if there was the possibility of the transfer of power and eventually accountability.

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

There's a powerful normalcy bias at work here. People can acknowledge a long list of ways the "American way of life" is circling the drain, but day to day it feels like things will basically be the same. People keep going to work, paying into retirement, and planning holiday vacations.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We're stuck with the choice of voting for someone who will accelerate the decent into authoritarianism or voting for someone who won't stop it.

Where should we find the hope?

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That’s not the option, but the authoritarians would have it that way if allowed.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Ideally the best option is running for office. But you need money, and you need to actually want to do it

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

Hope is for people who want to sit around doing nothing while they wait for things to spontaneously get better all on their own.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But there will be something, correct? Some fight, some resistance. Assuming you’re not planning on giving up that is.

And you can call the stubborn cunts of that resistance whatever you like, but good money’s on something with a lot of high-value name recognition like, I dunno, “democrats” or something.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Federal government representatives are calling the Democratic party terrorists on national television. There will be something, but it won't be an organized political party. The Republicans will not cede power peacefully ever again. I honestly can't tell you what that will look like because I didn't know how much Americans will put up with, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that Republicans will not give up federal power without violence. They are already actively violent.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 3 points 2 days ago

They certainly are, I agree! But they’re cowards.

Republicans only want to fight the weakest opponents, in rigged matches, and they still gotta cheat. Even a little resistance, when we stand together, dissolves their cotton candy confidence.

I was lucky enough to see a small piece of what that kind of resistance looks like on Sunday after canvassing. The organizers did us a solid and got us into a rally in queens that was packed. The energy was really encouraging, especially seeing all the other volunteers and various groups that are actually showing up, to help and to fight. It mirrors a lot of the grassroots movements and community building popping up in many cities and towns across the country.

It’s encouraging because it illustrates victory directly. Standing up for each other in spite of those threats of violence is courage, and historically that’s the strongest “antifa weapon” we know, because fascism can only lose wherever courage remains.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ya know, most countries don't give one person infinite get out of jail free cards.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We just value freedom here. ~revs big truck, slurps from 32oz diet soda~

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

32oz? Why did you get a small? It's diet!

[–] socsa@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

This won't go anywhere. There's plenty of public examples of Biden discussing the pardons. He's still lucid enough to testify if needed.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

If they're opening this box what makes you think they'd do it if they wouldn't still have power in 3 years? Everything they're doing they're doing like they're never gonna not be in power. We should all be paying attention to that.

[–] supamanc@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume that there will be a change of government in 3 yrs time....