this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
83 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26243 readers
2785 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

My interpretation The administration wants to label antifata as a foreign terrorist organization. This would add legal teeth to stop anti fascists. Any organization that this administration thinks is anti nazi or anti fascist could legally be shutdown if this goes through.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Antifa isn't an organization at all, it's just an abbreviated version of the adjective 'anti-fascist' that people have been using to describe themselves to show they stand against fascism.

I mean, the regime can make up any name they want, designate it or any organization they don't like as a terrorist organization, then just say that whoever they want to arrest is a member of it.

Part of what's making it easier for them to do this with 'antifa' is that it was probably a mistake to abbreviate 'fascist' as 'fa' in the first place, which means the average person may not understand what 'antifa' actually means. If the full term 'anti-fascist' had been used all along, it would be harder for them to say "anti-fascism is bad!" or "the anti-fascists are bad!" Because they'd be saying they're the opposite of that, i.e., openly calling themselves fascists (which TBH they don't seem to have a problem with).

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This is why I've been putting it in quotes for years now, as well as often spelling it out. I'd suggest others do the same.

When I've heard a Confederate railing against "antifa" I've asked them to explain what they mean, and to explain why they are against anti-fascism? What is it about fascism that they support? And if someone is anti-anti-fascism, what does that mean they support?

A similarly fun conversation is when someone is railing against "woke" - ask them what the opposite of woke is?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

What is the opposite of woke? Sleep?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

That's also why they purposefully mispronounce it as "Anne Teefa."

There's more of an organization behind BLM than antifa and even BLM is very decentralized.

They do touch on that in the article that's it's a way of thinking not an organization but the guest doesn't think it matters. Trump said on TV he's going to do it so unless he's challenged I think he will get away with it. This will then give him teeth to go after anti fascists.