this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
518 points (97.8% liked)

World News

46718 readers
2369 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 83 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I don't know why people are clowning this, pay 10M for one military grade truck or pay 10m for 200 civilian grade trucks that can have inherent camouflage...

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, disguising military equipment as civilian vehicles just means any enemy is going to target civilian vehicles, but yeah can't argue with cost efficiency.

[–] Spacemanspliff@midwest.social 34 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unfortunately any large scale conflict with north Korea is probably going to require just that.

[–] Steamed_Punk@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

Probably wouldnt be too hard, with North Korea being as poor and hard hit with sanctions as it is, there are few motor vehicles in the country, and in a war time scenario they would likely be using almost every single one (except for the personal vehicles owned by party elites) in a military capacity.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

NK already has mandatory military service for 10 years starting at 17 years old. If they went to war they could just draft literally everyone else. Doubt you could consider anyone but the children and the elderly "civilians"

[–] Spacemanspliff@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago

It'll be very similar to how things went down in Japan during WW2 where they'd militarized all of their civilians

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Civilian trucks are expensive decoys compared to balloon or plywood ones, but on balance probably not that bad given that unlike having to make and store pure military decoys, functional civilian trucks make money during peacetime.

[–] roboticide@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is a valid way to camouflage rocket artillery that was seen in Iraq by US armed forces.

It won't stop the US and S. Korea from also just bombing every garbage truck if it comes to it, but we then waste a ton of bombs on harmless garbage trucks trying to hit ~100 rocket trucks.

It's a good idea.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And after the West bombs those vehicles, NGOs will claim that the US were killing civilians. Genius!

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

Every country that has gone to war has killed civilians.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe stupid but if it works, then it works!

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] And009@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

World war 3 let's go

[–] DontAskAboutUpdog@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

My point exactly. Why launchbrockets at your enemies when you can throw trash.

[–] bobman@unilem.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Probably because civilian trucks aren't as capable as military ones. Hence why none of the respectable militaries in the world go this route.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

Well yes, kind of the point of guerilla asymmetric warfare is that you're not going to succeed using the same tactics as your enemy.

The might of the US military still lost to a Vietnamese army using lots of civilian gear and struggled to manage a bunch of Toyota Hiluxs with light machine guns bolted on in Afghanistan.

[–] FlowVoid@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

A military truck doesn't cost anywhere near 10M. Humvees cost $70-100K, a bigger military truck costs about twice that. Considering off-road capability, crew protection, and ease of repair, it's a far better investment than a dump truck (which costs $100-200K).

Of course those prices don't include the weapon systems, but dump trucks don't come standard with rocket launchers either.