this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
2038 points (96.2% liked)

Memes

47190 readers
835 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even in America, I have seen a fair few parents carrying their kids around by bike. It seems it’s not totally impossible, though you may need to put your bike through some upgrades.

[–] andy_wijaya_med@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I don't dare to bring my now 3 months old baby with bike. The weather is still "summer"y now. In winter I wouldn't do it. I myself have fallen down from bikes at least 4 times in the last couple of years. I can't imagine if that happens while I'm taking my baby with bike.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

It's possible, but it's really obnoxious and shitty. Especially if the weather is too cold for a new born to be outside.

New born parents is one of the few true excuses to use a car over a bike, imo.

But that's okay, we'll still need roads for emergency services anyway so it's okay if some people use them.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I bet those people are doing it for economic reasons, not environmental ones. A bicycle is probably the most dangerous form of transportation for you to have your kid on.

[–] Michal@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

How us bicycle more dangerous than cars?

Sure cars have all the safety features for people on the inside, but on a bike you're exposed to much slower speeds and better field of view. Bike accidents have much smaller fatality rate than car accidents.

Unless of course you mean cycling among cars is less safe, but that argument just confirms that cars are unsafe, not bikes. Bikes are not dangerous. Cars are.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It wouldn't be any dangerous if car and bike infrastructure was structurally separated (and if there were far fewer cars).

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That should be changed, shouldn't it?

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course, but if my vehicle was the only vehicle in the world, I'd still feel like a 2 year old kid on the back of my bike going 7 miles is more dangerous than on a bus, train, or even a car over the same distance.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, a seat on the back is the least safe option to transport kids.

There are options like this though. Seatbelts, low position, side walls.

[–] Kolrami@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't mind this too much, but I'd want more padding for the kid and an extra wheel in the back for stability.