this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
236 points (98.8% liked)

Ukraine

10409 readers
236 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Source: https://t.me/DPSUkr/15164

Translation:

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦The USA will supply ATACMS ballistic missiles to Ukraine on a permanent basis and there will be more missiles

Source: Minister of Foreign Affairs Dmytro Kuleba on TV channel 1+1.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

no, not really, your options is small cluster warhead with longer range or 3x bigger cluster warhead with less range (the one used in berdyansk), neither of which are effective against armour, and then there's unitary variant, which would require direct or almost direct hit. so no, it's only good against soft targets: aircraft on runways (not in hardened hangars or such), SAM sites, ammo depots, radar installations, unarmoured vehicles, troops in the open and so on. unitary variant might be good against command centers

that's still a lot of valuable targets