this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
529 points (100.0% liked)

196

17690 readers
748 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

imperial system is based on metric(on wikipedia) so they calculed on metric, converted to imperial, that is basically metric but worse

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kinda sorta not really.

One problem with units is defining them precisely.

For example, a meter is ostensibly "one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the North Pole along a great circle". That's not exactly precisely defined because the earth isn't a perfect sphere.

So currently, a meter is defined to be the distance light travels in a vacuum in 9192631770 / 299,792,458 hyperfine structure transitions of caesium-133.

Rather than doing the same sort of thing with updating the standard definition of a foot or pound, the US just piggybacked off the work precisely defining metric units and defined imperial in terms of metric.

So now a foot is officially the precise distance light travels in some number of hyperfine structure transitions of caesium-133, and the US government didn't need to do a thing.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

If only they made a meter equal a yard. I'm okay with a bigger yard.