this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
161 points (91.3% liked)

Technology

70550 readers
4252 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago (4 children)

So basically I would just have to screenshot the image or export it to a new file type that doesn't support their fancy encryption and then I can do whatever I want with the photo?

[–] Phrodo_00@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

The point is that they can show anybody interested the original with the signature from the camera.

The problem is that you can likely attack the camera's security chip to sign any photo, as internally the photo would come from the cmos without any signing and the camera would sign it before writing it to storage.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] lemming741@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

i would probably download a cock and suck it

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

It's signed, not encrypted. Think of it as a chain of custody mark. The original photo was signed by person X, and then edited by news source Y. The validity of that chain can be verified, and the reliability judged based on that.

Effectively it ties the veracity and accuracy of the photo to a few given parties. E.g. a photo from a known good war photographer, edited under the "New Your Times" newspaper's licence would carry a lot more weight than a random unsigned photo found online, or one published by a random online rag print.

You can break the chain, but not fake the chain.

[–] Neon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I think you misunderstand what this does

It gives you a "certificate" that proofs that the Photo you took is genuine

It doesn't stop you from editing a Picture