Malicious Compliance

21089 readers

3 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

2633

Businesses can discriminate against their customers? Alright then... (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by minimar@lemmy.world to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

354 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

It's ok now because the Supreme Court just upheld that a woman who said she was asked to design a website for a gay wedding by a man "Stewart", could discriminate and not serve him.

The fact that they tracked him down and found that he has been married to a woman for the last 15 years and the claims may be complete fiction.

The rules have changed so now the court has made discrimination not a bad thing, so the right wing will have to deal with being discriminated against if they want so badly to discriminate themselves.