this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
59 points (98.4% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

EU needs to abandon unanimity in decision making - it's not even the veto of one "country", but of one party in one country. Same for UN. Pure consensus is not working.

[–] sciencesebi@feddit.ro 6 points 1 year ago

This veto shit made sense when there were 6 countries, now it's getting stupid.

[–] neumast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, ruling party ÖVP is already afraid of next years election and trying to get some votes with stupid actions like this.

Können wir ein bundesland aufhetzen?

[–] letmesleep@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Same for UN.

Not really sure it would work. The security council legitimizes actual wars. In that case I'm okay with there being too much safeguards. The same goes for the EU. If we actually decide to invade a country, I'd prefer it that all 27 member states are unanimous. If everyone from Hungary to Ireland decides that a county needs bombing, then I believe it.

Apart from such things I do agree with you. For most policies (e.g. sanctions) we shouldn't need unanimity. Though in some cases a bigger qualified majority (like 75% of population and states) might be better.

[–] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Within EU there are proposals to move to QMV for most topics (spanish presidency still pushing this), problem is vetos block such reform. EU doesn't have any power to invade (yet?). Regarding UN, most processes, like UNFCCC and even IPCC, operate by consensus - this dilutes many outcomes, it’s a pity. As for UN-SC, its record of helping is not great, just legitimizes old power, maybe should be abolished. I'd rather see a weighted GA vote (maybe excluding parties to a conflict).

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With rightwing conservatives gaining power in EU, what could go wrong.

[–] benjhm@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure need to consider that - but what bad policy could they get through QMV (>> simple majority but << consensus), that a lone more progressive m-state might otherwise block ?