this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

18 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

A stark example of how digital footprints will be utilized in a post-Roe America

The article is from Aug 10, 2022 but remains relevant

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

It is not a different issue. It is an issue of basic human rights.

I don’t believe it’s a basic human right to murder a late term foetus. That’s not a right enshrined in any UN convention or national constitution. That’s something you want.

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Do any constitutions or UN conventions give you the right to use the internet? Shouldn't this count as healthcare, for which there are at least 6 UN conventions? Don't 13 states ban all forms of abortion including early, in which not even the heart has formed?

[–] Killakomodo@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Yeah but your opinion is total shit and worthless ...... so who cares what you gotta say?

awe seems I pissed off religious extremists how ever would I sleep at night after this, oh yeah just fine.

[–] Pandantic@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, I’m pro-choice and I downvoted you because you would rather troll this person and add to the negativity than state your case. I downvoted them too, for the record.

[–] Killakomodo@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why make a case to people who have no want to hear said case, have probably heard all the cases already and continue to want to control people? I am done talking to people that want to decide others lives and put them at risk, they don't care about them so why should I care about the person trying to retain control?

I am willing to explain myself to you, but you as stated do not intend to steal rights and you being pro choice already know all the reasons why I am against people taking others rights so I don't have to explain it because it is falling either on ears that know or ears that don't want to hear.

I am sick off pretending malice is ignorance.

I am just telling them to get lost as we should with all people that want to take others rights.

[–] ladychelseaofthevoid@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as a late term abortion. The fetus would be viable. No person seeking an abortion would wait seven to nine months, bullshit laws or no bullshit laws. An abortion is a termination of a pregnancy, not a fetus. Abortions are typically performed before the embryo even has a chance to develop into a fetus (10 weeks).

[–] xuxebiko@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Pegatron@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As of 2015 in the United States, more than 90% of abortions occur before the 13th week, 1.3% of abortions in the United States took place after the 21st week,[4] and less than 1% occur after 24 weeks.[5][6]

No one is terminating viable fetuses in the third trimester.