Free and Open Source Software

18263 readers

6 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Gaywallet@beehaw.org

alyaza@beehaw.org

Florp, the Firefox fork with an awful name, is fully source-available again (github.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/foss@beehaw.org

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The repository for the previously private submodule is still called Floorp-private-components, though it's public.

https://blog.ablaze.one/4125/2024-03-11/ is a maintainer's official response to... Reddit, which crossposted me apparently. Hooray!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

TL;DR: Open source is meant to be open as in open for any use

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But it is open for any use.

[–] starman@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

NC in CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 stands for non-commercial

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yea, I know. The license doesn’t restrict use. Anyone can use the software for any purpose. They just can’t sell it.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Commercial use is use

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 2 points 11 months ago

No, commercial exploitation is assumed ownership. It isn’t use. Open source is not CC0 — or at least that’s not the only possible open source license.

BTW, I agree that, in this case, the dev is just throwing a tantrum over using the wrong license for his earlier work.