this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
310 points (98.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62458 readers
186 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or that will be their first target

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I2P stumbles out of bar drunk, my timesss has come!

[–] Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it possible to access clearnet sites on I2P? (I haven't used it before but I have heard of it.)

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Theoretically possible but definitely not built for it.

Tor serves the clear net access problem.

I2P because of its design is a lot better suited for p2p file transfers, while maintaining anonymity.

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, check out outproxies

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not an easy target, since the technology/protocol is integral to many large businesses' infosec operations.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You don't have to ban VPNs. Just force everyone doing business in the US to keep logs and to comply with blocking websites via federal law (that will be dictated by the MPAA)

Boom. VPNs "banned"

[–] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

Just use a foreign VPN (basically all trustworthy, privacy-focused VPN providers are located outside the US, e.g. Mullvad in Sweden, IVPN in Gibraltar or Proton VPN in Switzerland) and connect to an exit server outside the US

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, that's not out of the realm of possibility of things going down that way, but good luck getting that passed and then enforcing that, especially internationally.

Also, I have to wonder if there's an argument to be made about undue burden. But NAL, so dunno.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well...any VPN provider that won't comply would be blocked from doing business in the US.

[–] far_university1990@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Which you can bypass… with a vpn. Self fulfilling market offer.