this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
503 points (100.0% liked)

196

17551 readers
887 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 89 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Bullshit. Conservatives don't want people living in tents. I'm tired of all this propaganda. They clearly want anyone who can't afford a house in a prison, not a tent.

[โ€“] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Where they'll do slave labor.

[โ€“] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Won't someone think of the shareholders!?!?

[โ€“] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

Sure as shit not going to let you have an Airstream.

[โ€“] Theme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Was it Kemi or Priti in the UK who wanted to arrest unhoused people for having a tent?

One of the ghouls. It's so hard to keep up with the cruelty and scandals

[โ€“] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was Priti iirc. Kemi is the one who wants to genocide transgender people.

[โ€“] englislanguage@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Which is more expensive for the state, i.e., even from a pure capitalist point of view the least favorable option.

[โ€“] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

From a Pure capitalist POV, the only thing wrong with that scenario is that the prisoners probably won't be working. Or won't be working enough. Capitalism isn't concerned with a balanced state budget

[โ€“] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nah in America prisoners are literal slaves as allowed in the 13th amendment so the GAP and Nike will be plenty happy the more people are in prison. :(

[โ€“] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

This. And same with the libs. Any time people try to set up a safe tent encampment, the pigs come through to brutalize and move them along.