this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
1893 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

7211 readers
1539 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 90 points 10 months ago (4 children)

"senior Democrats" would rather Trump than a progressive. At least Trump is good for their stocks.

[–] jorp@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago (2 children)

These fuckers insider trade and make money no matter which way the market goes. This isn't it, they just know that no matter who wins the rich will continue to run the country so it doesn't really matter to them. The only threat to the wealthy ruling class is the left (not liberals, the actual left)

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago

They (wrongly) think that they're too powerful to be harmed.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 10 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He is. They own the same stocks in the same companies.

Democrats like immigrants the same reason the Republicans do they just don't have to pretend to hate them for their base they are replacing the labor with. And will also accept cheap slaves if they can get them.

Democrats are even some of the largest receivers of donations from weapons manufacturers they just more carefully call it "Defense Funds".

Do not fail to see the upper party member apathy as anything other than acceptable oligarchy capitalism with anger that they will have to try harder on social pandering.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Probably better than someone like Bernie would be. Only because the rich would pull their money out and crash the economy so they could blame it on him. Personally I'd call it economic terrorism and put them all in Guantanamo

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hard to get that calculus right well into one’s 80s

[–] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Or names apparently

[–] DeanFogg@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Divide and conquer. Tale as old as time