Asklemmy

45294 readers

1018 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

will Lemmy lead to segmentation? (lemm.ee)

submitted 2 years ago by Gogenon@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

With reddit we mostly had a single subreddit for a given topic, for the sake of the question let's use gaming. If there were alternative subreddits dedicated to the same topic, they had names that gave that away. Do you think Lemmy will lead to more segmentation, and more information bubbles seeing as we now can have gaming@x and gaming@y without a obvious way to see which community is the "default" one? Will it be a good thing, as you can find a community that suits your preferences better, or will it stifle discussion?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jake_eric@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think people are worrying about it too much.

On Reddit, there were tons of duplicates. r/tumblr and r/CuratedTumblr. r/animemes and r/animememes and r/goodanimemes. r/gaming and r/games.

For Magic the Gathering there was r/magicTCG, r/mtg, r/magicthecirclejerking, r/MagicArena, r/EDH, r/mtgmemes, r/mtgfinance, r/ModernMagic, r/Pauper, r/mtgbrawl, r/DinosaursMTG, a bunch more, plus probably a dozen more I didn't even know about.

Dungeons & Dragons had r/DnD, r/dndnext, r/onednd, r/DungeonsandDragons, r/DnDMemes, r/3d6, and again, lots more.

If there are enough people in each community, great! More communities! If not, that's still okay! People will naturally gravitate towards more active communities. A lot of the duplicate communities will eventually figure themselves out and one will become the "main community." We just have to wait a bit. For now I'm just subscribing to anything that matches my interest to see what happens with it.

[–] macracanthorhynchus@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

And if the whole MTG community is subbed to all 10 of the different MTG communities, and participates in each of them regardless of instance... where's the problem? And the if one mod goes on a power trip or one instance crashes, the other duplicate instances will just fill the void. Of everyone is still subbed to the duplicate communities, I can only see this as a positive.