this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1813 readers
50 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

LLMs know nothing. literally. they cannot.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I guess it comes down to a philosophical question as to what "know" actually means.

But from my perspective is that it certainly knows some things. It knows how to determine what I'm asking, and it clearly knows how to formulate a response by stitching together information. Is it perfect? No. But neither are humans, we mistakenly believe we know things all the time, and miscommunications are quite common.

But this is why I asked the follow up question...what's the effective difference? Don't get me wrong, they clearly have a lot of flaws right now. But my 8 year old had a lot of flaws too, and I assume both will get better with age.

[–] mawhrin@awful.systems 1 points 11 months ago

i guess it comes down to a philosophical question

no, it doesn't, and it's not a philosophical question (and neither is this a question of philosophy).

the software simply has no cognitive capabilities.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

don't compare your child to a chatbot wtf

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 1 points 11 months ago

The dehumanization that happens just because people think LLMs are impressive (they are, just not that impressive) is insane.

[–] Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but neither did Socrates

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 1 points 11 months ago

but he at least was smug about it