this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

18584 readers
11 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
6
How do you see the integration of link-aggregation and microblogging? (lemmy.cloudhub.social)
submitted 2 years ago by jax@lemmy.cloudhub.social to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Thinking about the future where Microblogging and link-aggregation sites on the fediverse have grown, how do you see them integrating?

It's a bit one-directional right now since I don't think Lemmy has the concept of following people or #topics outside of Lemmy, but mastodon users can follow Lemmy communities and the posts and comments show up fairly nicely.

Do you think the ability to combine those two domains in one interface (even the same timeline) is useful at all?

I'm envisioning a content creator posting a video on peertube and being posted to one of the link-aggregator instances and people commenting on it via Mastodon and all of the comments being able to reference each other no matter where they were posted. I think that's pretty amazing compared to what we have now where you're conversation is basically stuck where it was started on the traditional services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eshep@social.trom.tf 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

@jax It sucks you can't subscribe to #PeerTube stuff from #Lemmy. Simply having the ability to pull hashtags into your feed would be a nice touch. Or just letting users subscribe to things via #RSS could help.

I comment on PeerTube stuff from #Friendica but don't see any (dis)like counts and only some of the comments. If the video post is looked at from #Mastodon, it seems to display all the comments, #Pleroma shows the same limited few as Friendica, and #Misskey shows most of the comments seen on PeerTube. But none show any (dis)like counts from PeerTube, the ones they do show are limited to how likes are distributed for that software.

As far as Lemmy votes are concerned, they display and function quite nicely within Friendica. I shows me the same number of both up/down votes as likes/dislikes as I see if I look at them on Lemmy.

Maybe one day somebody will unlock the secret for full interoperability amongst all ActivityPub services. Till then, we're just stuck trying to find ways around the limitations we have.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

Full and mutual interoperability just means everything develops toward the same feature sets, which probably isn't what we want.

Core features should always be interopable, of course, but we don't want to box developers in.

[–] jax@lemmy.cloudhub.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Awe :/ yeah that’s not nearly as integrated as I first thought it would be :(

I wonder if it would be possible to build like, a bridge that converts different types of actions to other actions that make sense on another platform?

[–] eshep@social.trom.tf 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@jax I think what all #ActivityPub connected things need is a standard for intercommunication. Things that don't necessarily get passed, but can be pulled, cached, and updated. Basic things such as timestamp in UTC, service used, post/reply hierarchy, full comment threads, title vs body, and surely a few more. Each service could add their own flairy bits on top of that to give their software its unique flavor. The likes/dislikes or up/down votes replicating to everyone is something I've heard is a deliberate(?) ""feature"". Personally, I don't think those need to be any more than an acknowledgement between two people, not a public advertisement of comment popularity.

[–] jax@lemmy.cloudhub.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, I thought the ActivityPub standard was a lot more standard than it actually seems to be. That's probably both a good and bad thing. It would be nice to see some more cohesion though.

[–] matthieu_xyz@piaille.fr 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@jax @eshep It has been a problem for a long time, yes.

But there are people working on standardizing everything. It’s a fairly recent project, not very big in scope and not very mature. But it’s getting there.

It’s called FEP (Fediverse Enhancement Proposals) and it’s like RFC for the fediverse.

You can find the standards here:
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/

And the discussion there:
https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/c/standards/fep/54

[–] matthieu_xyz@piaille.fr 1 points 2 years ago

@jax @eshep

Socialhub is also running on discourse which is ALSO implementing an ActivityPub plugins, which will be compatible with lemmy! And how do we know that this will be compatible with lemmy? Because they’re following the FEP-1b12!

You can find them here @feps (the plugin is read-only at the moment)