this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
595 points (98.4% liked)

196

17019 readers
658 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That's really rude! What if I'm having sex with a trans woman? That doesn't make her "the other guy", not even if she penetrates me with her gigantic girl cock that dwarfs mine.

[–] philluminati@lemmy.ml 59 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Gay sex is limitless compared to straight sex because they don’t stack infinitely.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 43 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Unless the gals wear strap-ons and the guys are into pegging.

You can have an infinite series of straight, stacked fuckers, you just have to constrain 'straight' by the condition 'sufficiently kinky'.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

OwO to the first paragraph. Can someone explain the second?

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I'm mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.

If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men's butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed...

The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.

A 'constraint' is very loosely in set theory / math terms ... basically a way of saying... these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we 'constrain' some of the factors.

So I am 'constraining' the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.

Unironically, that doesn't involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.

EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperiodic_tiling

Why, yes, I am both autistic and have a dirty mind, how could you tell?

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 days ago

Beans please.

We do beans around here, apparently, rofl.

i knew it, i felt it, sp3ctr4l is a reference to Spectral Theorem. Every real, symmetric matrix is diagonalizable.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I think I misunderstood the original comment. I retract my previous statement.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Picturing the resonance of the human sexipede is funny to me.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The human sexipede

[–] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I wonder what would happen if they made a loop.
Would they be stuck like that?

[–] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 days ago (3 children)

A risk I’m willing to take

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Ah the mythical Ouroboros of Pegging.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Now this is science I can get behind! Let's get someone behind me!

[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago

for science!

[–] Moose@moose.best 10 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

How many guys does it take? Some group must have attempted this at a fur con room party or something. 2 - 4 would be too few, 5 might be where it starts to be possible but very uncomfortable. I think about the 8 - 10 person range would be the sweet spot. We need our ~~top~~ switch scientists researching this at once!

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

Maybe we haven't heard of successful attempts because it's like when ants get stuck in a loop.

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 20 points 4 days ago

It's 2025 and there are still way too many people who utterly refuse to understand that heterosexuality is a choice. Just kidding.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm the guy and the other guy is the guy whose wife we are DPing

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You keep saying that but I told you I don't have a wife. It's just me and you, buddy.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 10 points 4 days ago

What have we been putting our dicks in?!

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago

Drugs take you to some crazy places.

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Good question! I guess I'm the other guy. No way I would be the main character!