this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
165 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3958 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Picasso@thelemmy.club 5 points 10 hours ago
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

The money is not gone, is just that someone else has it.

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 68 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

More like bye-bit, am I right??

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 10 points 21 hours ago

Angry upvote you horrible genius.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago
[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 36 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so glad I have no crypto of any kind. It's the wild west with no savings insurance, so once it's gone, it's gone.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Depends which exchange you're using.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Anybody who keeps their money on an exchange any longer than necessary is just asking for trouble. An exchange is like a public toilet. You get in, you shit, and you get the fuck out. You don't hang around in a public toilet.

Self custody or GTFO.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 13 minutes ago

That's not what the question was about.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 16 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

How does one get ones hands on a cold wallet?

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 47 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

My speculations:

  • "insecure from the start" - as in , the wallet was never that "cold"

  • with that amount of money, it's easy to imagine an "insider threat"

  • the hackers could have gotten lucky and struck right when the company was doing legitimate operations on the wallet

  • but probably it's a towering mountain of incompetence, composed of the elements above and more

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 11 hours ago

Right next to their iq

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 18 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

It's a common misconception that a "cold wallet" is offline. It's still on the blockchain like any other wallet, it's just the keys that aren't on any network-connected computer.

It appears that in this case hackers managed to trick Bybit employees into entering the keys into a fake UI that gave the hackers access to them.

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee 11 points 19 hours ago

That’s room temperature wallet. It was used while claiming asset unused.

It is not cold storage anymore.

[–] Kualk@lemm.ee 4 points 19 hours ago

Tricked or “tricked”.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Do I understand this correctly, then, that this was some sort of MITM attack where valid requests to the multisig parties were replaced by malicious code while still appearing to be valid to the signers? That must be an inside job.

And this is the first time I have heard the word "musked" in this context.....

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Do I understand this correctly, then, that this was some sort of MITM attack where valid requests to the multisig parties were replaced by malicious code while still appearing to be valid to the signers? That must be an inside job.

I have no idea. I guess they'll release a lot more info regarding this in the next few days.

And this is the first time I have heard the word “musked” in this context…

I think his English isn't good looking at the rest of the message. Might be "masked" instead.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 11 points 20 hours ago

What I don't quite understand is how there is 1.5 billion in a single wallet. Or how are these things structured?

This article puts their total assets under management at $15.7b, which are held in different cryptocurrencies with ethereum at just above $5b.

So I am wondering how they have more than 1/6 of their Ethereum in a single wallet or were these multiple that were connected and got compromised through the same vulnerability? How expensive is it to have more individual wallets? Would it not be feasible to have it split in something like $100m chunks? Or any other more moderate size.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

I recommend gloves.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Well, either it wasn't as offline as they all thought, or someone pulled off an epic inside job.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

With steely determination

[–] nick@midwest.social 5 points 19 hours ago
[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago

I gotta get in on this hacking gig. Anyone know if any hacker groups are hiring?

/s for CSIS

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago