this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
284 points (99.7% liked)

World News

41221 readers
3336 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Marking the 3rd anniversary of Russia's invasion, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced the largest sanctions package since the war began, aiming to cripple Vladimir Putin's 'military machine.'

This move arrives as Donald Trump sidesteps Ukraine and Europe, asserting the US lead in ending the conflict.

Lammy reaffirmed Europe's commitment, stating there can be 'nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine.'

Additionally, the UK pledged £3 billion annually in support of Kyiv and stands ready to contribute troops if necessary.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes. Punish us. It's the only way we maybe might learn.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

How about Europe denies entry to rich americans?

[–] WhisperingEye@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sanctions, man! SANCTIONS ARE THE WAY TO GO!!!

[–] nogooduser@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t understand why there are still sanctions that can be applied. Shouldn’t have we gone all in from the start?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 21 hours ago

No, because then you don't have anything additional to add later. You want to keep twisting the screw.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Love the shade reporting here. 3 years after the war in Ukraine started the UK is vowing to get serious about sanctions.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and stands ready to contribute troops if necessary.

Won't this trigger a Russia-NATO war?

[–] leo141@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's been misquoted the article actually says:

In addition to sanctions against Russia, Lammy's statement also included a pledge to provide £3 billion ($3.78 billion, €3.61 billion) annually to Kyiv and "being ready and willing to provide UK troops as part of peacekeeping forces if necessary."

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The distinction being that they will not be stationed in areas with active combat, but rather as a militarized police? Sounds like the distinction is quite subtle in reality and might be (willingly or not) misinterpreted, no?

[–] momocchi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

No it means in the event a peace deal is reached the UK may contribute troops to enforce that peace

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Pathetic, this dividied by voting age group is only £60 per year. People pay more for streaming serivces! Whike russians are spending about 10% of their gdp (allegedly) on this war... how hard is it to outspend them by EU alone!