this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
337 points (98.3% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

7292 readers
361 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Tobacco is still at least 2,000x too big.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 5 points 11 hours ago

Man that guy Urban needs so many houses... What does he even do with them all?

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 14 hours ago
[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 16 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 11 points 16 hours ago

Yeah that land could be used for more christmas trees

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Defense is a surprisingly large use of land. How is that? Can anyone explain the most land intensive uses of the Armed Forces? Like tank training areas maybe?

[–] kalpol@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Mikitary bases are pretty big. Air force, army, national guard, naval air stations, naval bases, there is a lot going on there.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Can't forget that military bases are communities where people live, too. Not just barracks and mess halls for individuals, but there are full neighborhoods and shopping centers for families.*

*My knowledge on this is limited, I just remember visiting a family member on base when I was younger.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

This is correct

[–] RecipeForHate1@lemmy.ml 6 points 14 hours ago

Get rid of livestock

[–] aphonefriend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

So nice of the 100 largest land owning families to have the same amount of land as the entire urban or rural housing population of the rest of the country. I assume it's to fatten themselves up for the rest of us just like the cows.

When do we get to eat them again?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Shit I'm hungry now I'll start the smoker

[–] ray@lemmy.ml 25 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Gotta see one of these with parking.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It would be a subset of "urban commercial", right? Somewhere in the range of half to three-quarters of it?

[–] ECB@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago

Depends how these are defined. Public parking or on-street parking are likely in a different category, not to mention people's driveways.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Why do they keep allocating land to wildfires if they're so destructive? /s

[–] troybot@midwest.social 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That's the federal wildfire sanctuary established by president William McKinney. While most fire has been domesticated, the remaining feral fire is allowed to burn free in Utah.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

I heard that even though the fire was born here, it has illegal flameborn parents so they’re going to put it on a cargo ship with a bunch of pallets and deport it and that’s how we’ll solve the wildfire issue. Saw it on Joe rogan

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 76 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It seems a little inefficient to put all the airports together

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 5 points 20 hours ago

Its really not so bad once you get over the 12 hour drive.

[–] Killercat103@slrpnk.net 3 points 15 hours ago

Food we eat is sepperate from cow pastures...

Nice!

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Golf is way too big, imo. No other sport even makes the list here.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 24 points 1 day ago

Maybe we can combine it with "wildfires".

[–] MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Can we put the 100 largest landowning families in Florida, then saw it off from the rest of the country?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

no need to saw, when invasive species and the ocean is taking over. because florida loves to import all the illegal exotic animals, they got plenty reptiles, giant snails, giant rats. the latter 2 both carry nasty parasites.

[–] stray@pawb.social 2 points 14 hours ago

Shit, there are landlords in the snails?

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 10 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

And people will still say that the meat/dairy industry aren't a plague

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] TehWorld@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I have certainly heard of Weyerhauser, but had no idea they were that big. They're the only 'individual' owner shown. The land-owning families is odd as I'm sure it overlaps a lot with pasture and private timberland.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

hugging the west coast, there are tons of cow farms, and a small part of cali is for the military, SEAL training.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Where's the amounts used strictly for cars?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] litchralee@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It's quite interesting that "rural highways" is one of the categories identified, but not any other sort of improved road. The data source has a base granularity where one square is 250,000 acres (~100,000 hectares), and then additional state data is factored in for increased precision. It supposingly being USDA data, they might primarily care only about those highways used to connect farms to the national markets.

That said, I would be keenly interested in the land used for low-volume, residential streets that support suburban and rural sprawl, in comparison to streets in urban areas. Unlike highways which provides fast connectivity, and unlike dense urban-core streets that produce value by hosting local businesses and serving local residents, suburban streets take up space, intentional break connectivity (ie cul de sacs), and ultimately return very little in value to anyone except to the adjacent homeowners, essentially as extensions of their privately-owned driveways.

It may very well be in USDA's interest to collect data on suburban sprawl, as much of the land taken for such developments was perfectly good, arable land.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Remember, not all land is the same. Some is too dry to grow human food. Some too wet. There are also other things that land is either too or not enough.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 hours ago

Too cold or not enough warm.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I bet we could still multiply output by a decent number by replacing meat production with directly edible crops, if there was a need for it

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 4 points 20 hours ago

It us wild that there is not a need. Distribution is (or was) the issue. Very sad humans refuse to feed others.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would love to flip the railroad usage and cow pasture usage.

Also, mfs drinking too much corn syrup.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

theresa tiny part thats for maple syrup

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 17 points 1 day ago

"Wildfires" is a surprisingly large area. I wonder what the 2025 area for it is.

load more comments
view more: next ›