this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
478 points (92.7% liked)

politics

21142 readers
3748 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The Trump administration has canceled 90% of USAID's foreign aid contracts, including critical programs that provide lifesaving therapeutic food to malnourished children.

Mana Nutrition's CEO reports that ready-to-ship boxes of peanut paste that could save approximately 300,000 children are now stranded in a Georgia warehouse.

Despite Secretary of State Rubio's claims that "lifesaving humanitarian assistance" would be spared, numerous essential health programs have been terminated, including those preventing diseases like polio, HIV, and Ebola.

These cuts contradict claims about targeting "wokeness" or "waste," instead showing a reckless abandonment of America's global humanitarian commitments.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 132 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

humanitarian commitments

Don't you know, "humanitarian" falls under their "woke" umbrella.

These people think they're some kind of special above other humans. Musk literally believes everything is a simulation and only he is real.

Guys, is it woke to have compassion, empathy, and value humanism?

In their eyes, yes it is.

[–] Hellinabucket@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Isn't humanitarian just some new gender? Sounds woke AF..

[–] proper@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I don’t know what’s worse, being Sleepy or Being woke

[–] Infinite@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Wait, it's not vegetarian, pescatarian, humanitarian?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Musks eyes are currently bloodshot from all the ketamine and cocaine he has taken, that's why he's wearing shades

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 107 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Step 1: Get rid of USAID

Step 2: Cut all food stamps

Step 3: Most US farmers go out of bussiness

Step 4: Rich people buy up all farm land

Step 5: Food prices skyrocket due to monopolies and mismanagement and the rich get to become feudal lords.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Step 6: We feed the billionaires to the wood chipper and have French Revolution: American-style.

[–] swag_money@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

step 7: use wood chipper output as fertilizer for our crops in the community garden

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

I think in the interest of efficiency we need to just skip ahead to step 6.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Step 6 - Let 2/3 of the earth population die, replace most jobs with automation and AI. Keep the 1/3 of the population remaning as slaves and distraction. Enjoy the utlimate victory of capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 90 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Cancelling contracts already in progress. The epitome of "efficiency".

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yep, they'll get the government sued and lose so much more money through litigation and actually losing the law suits.

But of course, they don't care, for all their talk about deficits and taxes they know it's not their money in the end.

Unless some genius lawyer manages to somehow make Musk personally liable, of course, because none of this Doge stuff looks set up properly, so if the US ever does get back to some sort of rule of law, people will get in trouble for breaking all sorts of laws.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump's admin has already shown that you can't really sue the federal government into compliance if there isn't anyone to enforce it. Sure, those countries and companies and people can sue the US for breach of contract. The government will laugh in their face and not pay, simple as that. Trump literally made his millions doing exactly this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It just shows that efficiency isn't what this is about. It's about destruction.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

Destruction Of Government Enterprise

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Refusing to pay people and honor contracts has been Trump's MO for decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think the title could be any more clickbaity.

"Musk’s purges suddenly take a horrific turn—and wreck an ugly MAGA lie"

causing UNSPECIFIED event that of UNSPECIFIED lie of <unpopular movement [on lemmy]>

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 51 points 1 week ago (19 children)

US workers : I know it's mighty easy to say from a distance, but now is the time for disobedience

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 week ago

The best time for protest and disobedience was weeks ago. The second best time is now.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Even from a very cynical POV, this money was soft power. It was an investment to sell other products to the world.

Why do you think the world doesn't eat north korean burgers or watch russian blockbusters?

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

And not to mention that the food ... it's not bought from all over the world, a ton of the money was used to buy from farmers in the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

and wreck an ugly MAGA lie

The problem is that MAGA people either don't know about the problem, don't care about the problem, or would actively harm foreigners (or American minorities, for that matter) if it put even a penny in their pocket or made them feel superior.

Only the people that already know the republicans are lying their pants off know it's a lie, a fact worsened by corporate news media and social media firms censoring the virality of anything that could hurt the far-right.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago

There’s always another believable lie. Some other reason why.

My wife’s best friend has a conservative brother that got fired under DOGE shenanigans. 6-figure job that they relocated him to Germany to do. Now he doesn’t know if they’re even going to help him with relocating back to the U.S.

He says this is just a normal pendulum swing in life/politics, and it’s a reaction to liberal overreach. …? Not an ounce of ire toward the people who actually did this to him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Elon "I love killing poor children" Musk

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Considering his history as a white, South African, he probably is pretty delighted that he gets to make poor black babies starve there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

These trash humans got where they are by not caring about anyone but themselves. Their fans are mainly made up of people just like them. Therefore nothing horrible they do will convince most of their followers.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Not gonna change until it wrecks a few million maga lives.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If only the "pro-life" Trump voters actually cared about the lives of children.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

They only care about the control using children as an excuse. Woman and abortion, privacy and csam ect.

[–] lutillian@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

"'The unborn' are a convenient group of people to advocate for. They never make demands of you; they are morally uncomplicated, unlike the incarcerated, addicted, or the chronically poor; they don’t resent your condescension or complain that you are not politically correct; unlike widows, they don’t ask you to question patriarchy; unlike orphans, they don’t need money, education, or childcare; unlike aliens, they don’t bring all that racial, cultural, and religious baggage that you dislike; they allow you to feel good about yourself without any work at creating or maintaining relationships; and when they are born, you can forget about them, because they cease to be unborn. You can love the unborn and advocate for them without substantially challenging your own wealth, power, or privilege, without re-imagining social structures, apologizing, or making reparations to anyone. They are, in short, the perfect people to love if you want to claim you love Jesus, but actually dislike people who breathe. Prisoners? Immigrants? The sick? The poor? Widows? Orphans? All the groups that are specifically mentioned in the Bible? They all get thrown under the bus for the unborn."

~David Barnhart

The only reason pro choice exists is because the republican party found the perfect groups to advocate for and against. It makes their constituents feel all warm and fuzzy to say they're pro life, while they're given an equally convenient group to hate. Trans people make up just slightly less than one percent of the US population and the odds of one of their constituents will actually meet a trans person are significantly lower than them meeting that nice middle class gay/black Christian protestant couple who sometimes invites them over for supper after church on Sundays.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Dems should make some mention about this on the Sunday morning shows, if they were smart about it.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

No one dumb and selfish enough to vote for Trump will care about the suffering of people outside the US.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago

I mean yes, but the Democratic voting base will. Then promising to restore international aid would probably secure a good number of first and second generation immigrants' votes.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I personally know Christians who voted for Trump (yeah I know, but bear with me) that would care very much, as they actually do missionary work overseas to help the kind of people that would be affected by this cancellation.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RedDoozer@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago

A bad decision at so many levels. It's inhumane and they are loosing a soft power of being the good guys. Then, we will hear from western propaganda that it's China who is "buying" Africa's favors by providing humanitarian help.

Just help others for the sake of it, it's not that difficult.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 week ago

If Musk and Trump dislike wokeness so much, they should just go to sleep, and let others handle the statecraft.

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

Musk’s obsession with ‘efficiency’ is costing thousands of lives—this is dystopian governance.

🐱🐱🐱🐱🐱

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So what I'm hearing is that peanuts and vitamins are gonna be cheaper?

And all it costs is several thousand lives in countries most Americans couldn't pick out on a map, and a bunch of anxiety for peanut farmers.

What a great deal. Nobody could have made a better, more Christ-like deal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

These cuts contradict claims about targeting “wokeness” or “waste,” instead showing a reckless abandonment of America’s global humanitarian commitments.

How is this a contradiction? What did you think they meant?

load more comments
view more: next ›