this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
90 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38131 readers
138 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] emergencycall@fedia.io 11 points 22 hours ago

The new language seems equivalent to the old language.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For instance, Mozilla said it may have removed blanket claims that it never sells user data because the legal definition of “sale of data” is now “broad and evolving,” Mozilla’s blog post stated.

Uh huh.

The company pointed to the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) as an example of why the language was changed, noting that the CCPA defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by [a] business to another business or a third party” in exchange for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration.”

Yes. That's what "sale of data" means. Everybody understood that. That's exactly what we don't want you to do.

[–] remington@beehaw.org 29 points 1 day ago

Read the last bits at the end of the article though:

Firefox does collect and share some data with its partners, Mozilla said, including data that helps to power its optional ads on the New Tab page in the browser and for sponsored suggestions in the search bar, which are detailed in its Privacy Notice. However, the company says that the user data it does share is stripped of personally identifying information and is only shared in aggregate.

Users can continue to adjust their own data-sharing settings in the browser, Mozilla also said.

Personally, this doesn't compel me to stop using Firefox.

[–] thejevans@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah I really don't know how they thought that was a good explanation for them to remove the "we won't sell your data" stuff. Absolutely bonkers.

[–] cercello@mastodon.bida.im 3 points 1 day ago

@GenderNeutralBro @Greenpepper

I assume they meant it as confusing when you use firefox to, for example, buy a product.

I may be wrong though.

[–] Snowfall@beehaw.org 11 points 1 day ago

Good on them for hearing and responding to concerns.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 10 points 1 day ago

When Mozilla and Google started developing extra invasive data collection software together, I had lost faith in Mozilla. They're just google's lapdog.

Not much unlike their "quantum engine" being developed based on chromium as well. Which was simply not documented later on

[–] stormesp@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mozilla has been downhill for the last few years, first the opt out processing of your search data, then all the AI integration of bullshit, now the weird changes to their terms of use...

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

And all they have to do is allow direct donations for its development and they're golden