this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
1353 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

64075 readers
5845 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It was a strong year for Best Animated Feature Oscar nominations, and an underdog triumphed. At the 97th annual Academy Awards at Ovation Hollywood in Los Angeles last night, Flow beat competition from Pixar's Inside Out 2, DreamWorks' The Wild Robot and Aardman's Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl.

Gints Zilbalodis tale about a cat in a flooded world missed out on the Oscar for Best International Feature Film but still became Latvia's first Oscar win. And it was surely also the first Oscar winner to be made entirely in the free 3D modelling software Blender, cementing the open-source program's place among the best animation software.

Flow was one of our highlights of Annecy 2024, and it still seems incredible that it was made by a small team using Blender alone. It was rendered in EEVEE, Blender's realtime render engine.

Gints thanked Blender when accepting the award. Speaking to press afterwards, he said: "Any kid now has tools that are used to make now Academy Award-winning films, so I think we're going to see all kinds of exciting films being made from kids who might not have had a chance to do this before.

(page 2) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 189 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Reminder that Blender is struggling with funding right now. https://topicroomsvfx.com/news/the-price-of-free-blenders-funding-crisis/

Make sure to leave it a few bucks if you use it. https://fund.blender.org/

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (10 children)

Whenever I download a new version of Blender I typically throw them $10 - $15.

Just like with other open source software I use, I give it a shot and if I like it I'll throw them $10 - $15 each time I update.

Edit: It's not much but it's not nothing. No raindrop feels reasonable for the flood and all that.

[–] assa123@lemmy.world 28 points 19 hours ago

thank you for your support to FOSS!

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 9 points 16 hours ago

You do a lot, and thank you!

I also hope the studios behind the film made sure to pay a solid donation.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 50 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Nuh uh, headline. I bet the soundtrack wasn't made in Blender

[–] WereCat@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago

You can draw sound waves with grease pencil so it should be possible

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

There was somebody crazy enough to make an entire game in Blender, I don't doubt that somebody has at least tried to make a soundtrack in Blender.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Blender used to have a games engine built into it. It was actually kinda fun but shit, they axed it once Unity became king.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 17 hours ago

I wonder what they used for that. Perhaps Ardour.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The movie was really well done. It's a simpler animation style so don't expect Pixar level stuff, but the story and art direction are great.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 125 points 1 day ago (5 children)

It's a simpler animation style so don't expect Pixar level stuff

One of the things you learn in art school is that if you aim for something like realism (or Pixar, in this case), but you fail to get there, people will notice and critique you for it. If you aim for a style you can do well, on the other hand, nobody will care that you didn't do Realism (or Pixar).

Up and coming artists in any genre would do well to remember that it's okay not to be Pixar or Capcom or whatever. Sometimes working within your limitations can inspire truly creative works.

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 21 hours ago

I refer to this as the Wind Waker effect.

Before Wind Waker was announced, Nintendo did a reel showing off the power of the GameCube that included a "realistic" (for the time) fight scene between Link and Ganondorf. So when they announced a new Zelda game, people were hyped for a gritty realistic Zelda, and when the first trailers appeared, people hated it.

For years after its release, Wind Waker's art style was dragged on by people, but today, it's remembered as one of the most iconic Zelda games from that time period and a major influence on the aesthetic of many Zelda games after it.

Today, its art style looks just as good as it did when the game first launched, while most other games from that time period - especially those that went for high fidelity and realistic graphics - look outdated.

A good art style is timeless and will always age better than trying to push the envelope on graphical fidelity or realism.

Don Hertzfeldt made some amazing short films with a really, really simple art style.

The message sometimes matters more than the quality of the art. There is still a level of high quality to it despite the seemingly simple art style.

[–] commander@lemmings.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I always think about Metal Gear Solid when considering true top-tier 3D art. Actually, first-party Sony games in general tend to have the best 3D art out there.

Pixar animation is computationally intensive, but artistically it has way more in common with the 3D videos for babies that show up in youtube feeds if you're not logged in.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 16 hours ago

Sure. I wasn't implying they were realistic, I was just drawing an analogy between Realism, the classical art style, and modern animation styles (like Pixar's). Whatever style or genre you aim for, do it well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] commander@lemmings.world 8 points 17 hours ago

I just saw the trailer and thought it looked good.

Pixar has conditioned us to only value a certain kind of 3D animation that is very round and lanky, similar to Popeye. It's animation that exists to make things as easy as possible for the animators. Same thing with the calarts bean face. They don't care about creativity or art. They only care about making money as reliably and easily as possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Awesome to see Blender getting the love it deserves!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Devdoggy@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I loved this movie!! It has zero dialogue!!

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That cat was just amazing! Great flic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hera@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Incredible to see how far blender has come. I remember using it over ten years when I was trying to get off pirated software (3ds max), while it's still recognisable the capability has exploded

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 9 hours ago

Couldn't touch it 5 years ago. Now its daily life for me.

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i really wanna watch this in the cinema

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It is available to stream on Max, which means that if you do not have the means to legally stream it there, you'll be able to find it on the high seas. That said, if you do opt to watch it through "alternative means", make sure to at least send a little money Blender's way.

https://fund.blender.org/

But they said they wanted to watch it in the cinema. Confused by this reply.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm excited to check this out. My tastes rarely align with those of the Academy, but this looks like it could be a really beautiful film and these kind of efforts deserve support.

[–] Sylence@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago

Don't watch it because it won an Oscar, watch it because it is a beautiful, sweet movie about animals helping each other.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's a very simple film without much depth to be honest. Memoir of a snail was far better.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

without much depth

How much "depth" do you expect to get out a group of animals acting "mostly" natural and without a single line of human dialog? With those limitations, I think it excelled. There were even a couple tearjerker moments, for me at least.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 1 points 10 hours ago

Not having dialogue has nothing to do with. While the animals can only be so complex (if acting "naturally"), the storytelling is not limited to just that. They could've probably told more about the world with the elements and places the animals found. The animation was pretty crappy at some points too. The dog for example was not very well done.

Regardless of all of this, I'm not saying it should have been different, I only wanted to express that this movie is not worthy of an oscar when compared to something like Memoir Of A Snail, imo.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Me and my mother watched it a few weeks ago knowing nothing about it and it was really good!

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca -1 points 16 hours ago

It's so much better than The Wild Robot!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›