this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
162 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

69913 readers
2429 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 70 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I am very averse to companies breaking my trust.

Mozilla can win it back by explicitly stating what they are collecting, why they are collecting it, and making opt out the default.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah they're not going to do that until a few people leave the company. And they have no plans to leave.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And that's fine, I'll just use different browsers until they change their stance.

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's very optimistic. Mozilla is not in good shape and the c suite may simply ride their paychecks from the endowment off into the sunset.

[–] bizarroland@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's optimistic about telling a multi-million dollar company that if they don't operate with principles that I agree with that they won't get my business?

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Mozilla is run by a nonprofit and just lost 80% of its revenue from the Google ad antitrust case. How is your using their browser making them any money? That's literally the rub here. The whole promise of Firefox is that they don't data mine your activities like chromium browsers do and data mining and ads would be the way to make revenue anywhere near on par with what was lost. The CEO gets paid the same either way out of the billion or so that Mozilla has in financial reserve. Firefox keeps losing user base yet the CEO pay keeps going up.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago

If I were paid that well I would ride the sinking ship all the way to the bottom.

[–] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world 50 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember reading a lot this past year about Mozilla fretting about their market share and trying to figure out how to grow their user base. Did I hallucinate that? Cuz their actions lately appear to be driving users away. Are they taking notes from Google or is there some other MBA making these brilliant changes?

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember the Looking Glass fiasco? The people in charge of Firefox are so stupid it's indistinguishable from malice.

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Idk the CEOs $6mil salary sounds more like malice to me

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Need more advertising in Firefox to keep pumping those exec salaries.

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Most of their income has come directly from Google, the incumbent browser monopoly. I'm full tin foil hat on this one, Google is pulling the strings here.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn't judge rule that google can no longer pay mozilla?

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah you're correct the deal was cut off late last year so it was not renewed for 2025 but it was on the radar for a couple years. It's why the sudden sketchy rush for other sources of income so they can keep going as normal. I did make an edit to my post and changed 'comes' to 'has come'.

It's been set up to fail. Over 80% of their revenue was from that deal and Google could likely dictate whatever they wanted as part of it. That income is the only thing that even allowed for such an insane pay package for their c-suite in the first place, and so the current form of Mozilla is a direct result of all that cash. It's supposed to be a nonprofit and now they're basically in withdrawal because they cannot afford their insane"normal tech company leadership" salaries.

Idk how Mozilla survives this without another sugar daddy, the leadership pay looks like the biggest liability killing the company and they have to willingly give it up before the company goes bankrupt and/or becomes another ad machine.

I would really love for them to drop pocket and all their other stupid shit and just make a browser like they used to. Even just that is a huge undertaking these days though, and that is because of (again) Google's ability to basically dictate web standards. They strung Mozilla along as a pet "look we're not a monopoly" competitor while continuously raising the bar to entry for any competition. I think the antitrust case should have gone after web standards to allow for competition rather than basically cutting off the only real competitor, but that would have been harder to do and the actual case was based specifically on Google's search and ad monopoly rather than the chromium browser monopoly.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It never actually clicked to me how screwed mozilla is, but your comment made that pretty clear. At this point, to me it seems like the best course of action would be to fully embrace open source and community driven development instead of trying to run it like before, especially if paying wages becomes unsustainable.

[–] sinceasdf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

As of 2023 Mozilla had over 1.3 billion dollars in reserve (thanks Google!). This is not over yet, but it will be drained pretty quickly if they keep treating a nonprofit like a typical silicon valley tech company.

[–] neclimdul@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Firefox main problem with profitability relevance. They need more people to get people to use their tools

So I just have two questions.

  1. How does this get new users?
  2. How does this help retention?

The only answer is it doesn't and we don't care because we're going to cash out.

I'm not running away, I'll still open Firefox tomorrow like yesterday because the browser landscape is terrible and the shadow of what Firefox was is still good.

But I'm looking for the disruptor because as questionable as a lot of the new smaller browsers are, there are people out there trying and it's going to happen.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I'm waiting for Ladybird

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nah, Waterfox and Floorp devs are trying to make money out of their software.

LibreWolf or Zen

[–] Uberflussig@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago

As long as they do it ethically, there's nothing wrong with that. That's also how Foss projects stay alive.

[–] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Awh. I was gonna go with Floorp on the name alone. Great name...

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Nah, you can still try Floorp. It’s very similar to Vivaldi (Chromium). I’m happy with it after using it for a few days to where I uninstalled Firefox. Shame for Firefox, been a user since 2003 or whenever.

It took me less than five minutes to easily migrate my data from Firefox to Floorp. If Floorp enshittifies in the future, it’ll be super simple to migrate to another Gecko browser, or possibly Ladybird or other engines.

[–] SeeFerns@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Zen has been really nice for the few days I’ve been using it. It feels real sleek and just more modern over all.

My computer is a bit old though and I wonder if there is something similar that is even lighter on resources. Zen is still pretty dang light though.

[–] SeeFerns@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Anyone have any good iOS alternatives? I’m eyeing Orion currently

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Orion looks good as it does not collect any data. I don’t want Apple profiting from my safari usage.

[–] SeeFerns@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Same. I’m about done with all things big tech. As much as is possible at least. Orion it is! I also saw Vivaldi but I’m not super interested in all the other services that come along with it.

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wow it also supports Firefox and Chrome extensions on iPhone! That’s a killer feature!

[–] SeeFerns@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, started using it last night and I think it’s gonna stick. No complaints so far

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

After reading this comment, I downloaded it and am liking it so far. Thanks for spreading the word about it!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Bye Firefox. Boy we had some good times, huh.

[–] eight_byte@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I will stick with Firefox for the time being. One must not forget that Firefox provides the basis for all the alternatives listed here. Despite all the controversy surrounding Mozilla, I still think Firefox is the better alternative to Chrome. And I would like to support this at least until there is a truly free browser. My hope is that Ladybird will be a success. However, it will take at least another 1-2 years until development is so far advanced that it can be used as a browser for everyday use. Until then, I think we should all continue to support Firefox so that it doesn't disappear completely from the market.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 0 points 2 months ago

I kind of wish browsers would use cooler names, not "ladybird". Look at Brave. Pretty bad browser, surrounded in questionable stuff, but pretty much estabilished userbase nearly instantly, and I feel like much of that success is simply thanks to a catchy name