A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Where are the shitty racist Ukrainian Brighton Beach Krasnov and Government of Putin supporters? They should volunteer for the Ukrainian infantry and see the results of their fucking vote.
So he knew civilians would be killed by his actions and let it happen without any concern.
"... with the intel that we gave to them."
Siding with the Russians.
Good God, America.
Look at yourself, FFS!
Wow! These guys are so blinded by their love of privilidge.
Trust me, you’d rather be a Dem.
Fucking clueless.
letting friends die for his proffit. hope he likes the smell of blood on his hands
Someone should ask him what he would do if Russia took Alaska.
Well, you'd have to ask, was there a reason they took Alaska? They might have a good reason. Maybe they think there was something wrong with how we bought it from them. They might feel we took advantage of them. I mean, wouldn't you sympathize with someone that felt taken advantage of? They'll have a good reason. Russia wouldn't do anything on a whim. Not just to enrich themselves or establish a beachhead for the rest of the continental Americas; surely not.
Of course... even if it were a beachhead... Russia might have a good reason, and we like Russia, they're good friends. Maybe we should join together in some kind of union...
/s
PS: If someone was nodding their head along with the above, just know you're on the wrong side of... well, everything.
Okay let's game this out then. If you had a president who is stomping on your civil rights, tearing down the safety net, and crashing your economy - what is it that 'anyone would do'?
Play Nintendo. I like the character that wears green
Luigi
Weegee
Green Mario
L U I G I fucking M a n GiO N E
Can't say it on .world
Oof.
Glad I left that instance. Mods need to grow some spines and stop censoring things just because people complain.
We already have the tools to ignore others.
Too true.
Player 2 has entered the chat.
So another way to read this is Trump admitting that he wants to invade Ukraine?
I wouldn't do that.
Literally viewing the world like a EU4 map painting player would
Sure....it's what anyone would do to defeat their enemies.
Mexico shitting bricks rn
Lol I like to toot that trump should deal with all these illegal immigrants by offering state hood to their countries but he won't. Why? Color scale.
Good luck dealing with a Mexican insurgency.
I would heartily support one.
mexico??? you know the panama/canada/greenland talk yeah.
It's been a long standing right wing fantasy of sending the us military to deal with the cartels
What about that is right-wing?
The United States has a history of organizing campaigns to crush terrorist organizations. A month ago, the United States designated six cartels as terrorist organizations, which prompted Mexico to issue a warning about the United States attempting any sort of invasion or incursion. This is also occuring in tandem with the current President of the United States going on about taking Greenland and Panama, and how Canada should be part of the United States, which was also interpreted as a suggestion of a hostile takeover.
And then there are reports of them having been mulling options since November, talk of it by political candidates in 2023, talk by sitting members of Congress and even legislation introduced in support of it within Congress.
Not so curiously, these acts have been exclusively done by Republicans, also known as the Right-Wing.
Of course, if you could show that Democrats were as keen on the idea of invading Mexico, then calling it right-wring would be in error.
When your response to complicated situation that could be solved with non-violence is to send in the military - that's right wing
How do we solve it with non-violence?
Fix the root issue. Cartels thrive because yanks want drugs. Yanks mostly want drugs because there are issues in their lives they want to run away from and end up addicted to said drugs. Decriminalizing possession and offering detox programs to those addicted would already help reduce the demand by making people willing and able to come forward to get treatment for a drug addiction without fear of being arrested and having their lives ruined further. Then you can attack the source of this desire for drugs by passing laws that actually help people by offering them social safety nets and access to healthcare. Then you can legalize far less addicting and dangerous drugs like cannabis so people who do seek drugs won't go to black market ones that help cartels thrive.
There are SOOOOO many little steps that can be taken to reduce the power of cartels, but that would require Yanks to actually care about one another, not just about their own wallet and be willing to go for complex solutions, not just the easy solution of just shoot your problem, so I guess that's just never happening.