this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
184 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

8506 readers
1893 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 7 points 12 hours ago

It sucks that your country doesn't have a rule of law ngl.

[–] metaldream@sopuli.xyz 51 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

No way those bloodthirsty backstabbers vote for this.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 61 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's the point. Opposition bills in the US are often put forth to force members of the majority party to publicly vote against it, so that there is public record of their position on things.

It's an easy system to game, too, since it's trivially easy to include a poisoned pill in the bill that will push the members to reject it.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's like how up here in BC we got 3 conservative MPs to vote against opposing tariffs. Sometimes you just float a clear "no-brainer" bill to make the assholes clearly proclaim their assholeitude.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

It's important to never let the monsters hide behind their masks. They want passive compliance; never give it to them.

[–] TheGoddessAnoia@lemmy.ca 30 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Last I looked, any vote in Congress was foreordained unless a few Republicans were suddenly to come down with the measles, and even then, they'd probably drag themselves through DC, infecting everyone they passed, to prove their loyalty to their God Emperor.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

It's not about winning, it's about making them clearly state their intentions.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 16 points 19 hours ago

It's bread and circus friend. Forcing congressmen to go public with their stance on the issue.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

christ why not just spend that energy on the 25th and be done with this hellscape

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

25th has to be voluntary or enacted by a majority of the cabinet.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Congress worried about special military operations?

Does the constitution say that only congress can declare war?

[–] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 20 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Only congress can declare "war", but as far as I know, that hasn't happened since WW2. The president just does what they want.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

well maybe like congress could get a back bone?

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 19 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Why doesn't Congress, the larger institution, simply eat the president?

[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

This is how you end up with a brain worm.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 20 hours ago

I guess they like what the president is doing?

Same with the courts?

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago

Backbone? The majority are Trunp sycophants, cravenly fawning over Trump, suggesting bills to put his orange face on Mount Rushmore and the $100 dollar bill. Voting down this bill will show that they have military intention on one, some, or all of those countries and will show them for who they really are.

[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Trump: Pfft, I'll fund the army with healthcare money...

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

and take that money from its rightful owners (the rich)?

nah, it's deficit spending all the way down (including for a lot of those tax breaks the rich are getting)

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Wars are fought and paid by the poor for the rich.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a nice gesture but I don’t even think all democrats would vote for this.

[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago

Then we know who gets helicopter rides when the rides turn. Never forget!