this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
377 points (99.5% liked)

politics

21654 readers
4220 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So weird. SpaceX's competition? Getting attacked by little d and fElon?

Who could have imagined?

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's not really competition anymore though, since they often use SpaceX rockets for what they do now.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

They were never competition, exactly. NASA doesn't make spacecraft, they buy and sometimes modify them from industrial concerns and always have.

What they did do was be a federal space agency, with all that implies otherwise, which means a private company can't charge premium rates to do the things that absolutely have to happen that they were doing.

This is the privatization and militarization (through the inevitability of Space Force absorbing some responsibility) of space.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The US is gonna be so humiliated when China lands people on the moon and we have no infrastructure or tech in place to answer their move.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

We'll be sending the first live person to Venus and it will be our greatest hero, Elon Trump! We will show China what can be done when there's a will.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 17 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I fully support Musk and Trump landing on the surface of venus

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It could be a surprise! We tell them they're just going for a quick moon landing but then a little Boeing later...uhhh ahhh! They become the first two people to land on Venus. Probably less uhh and more ahhhhh!

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'd volunteer to be the first person to land on Venus. I know it's a straight up death sentence, but what a cool way to go.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Okay so 3 people! Excellent! We must make arrangements right away! Valla von dios!

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 13 hours ago

We know it's safe, because the greenhouse effect is a liberal lie.

[–] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 9 points 19 hours ago

The US is already humiliated

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 9 points 20 hours ago

We currently have no one meeting this head on with real leadership. Anyone with political capital to travel and speak with world leaders (as trump did when he wasn’t president) could be helping save this YET.

[–] MyMotherIsAHamster@lemmy.ca 126 points 1 day ago (1 children)

America is so deeply fucked, and 70-something million of them are too brainwashed to know it yet.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 42 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Another eighty million are too lazy to care.

And the remainder of us who are somewhat higher on the spectrum of both sanity and giving a fuck about humans and the world are losing our fucking minds at a distressing pace

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago

A Republican voter told me Trump would be thrown out of office if America loses the space race to China. Whenever I need a half-correct monkey paw fortuneteller, I guess I know where to find one.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So, is SpaceX just going to do all the infrastructure? Because this is just royally dumb.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 day ago

Yup, and they'll do it half as well for three times the cost.

Efficiency!

[–] 50MYT@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Rocket lab will be putting hands up and competing for some of the contracts

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This deeply pisses me off. You have no idea how excited I am to go back to the moon and if that goes down the drain imma lose it.

They are absolutely gonna kill the Artemis project. They already killed the launch vehicle (though, to be fair, SLS was an absolute albatross).

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 34 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I'm super worried about JWST... It's been absolutely amazing so far, and that fucker might just fucking axe it.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

JWST is fine. It's not going anywhere, and unless it is purposefully destroyed it will keep sending us data.

The NASA Deep Space Network collects it and distributes it, but Europe could just as easily set up their own interface to receive the data. DSN was already in place, so it made sense to keep using it.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago

2 out of the 3 DSN locations aren't even in the US or managed by NASA.

  • NASA manages the Goldstone complex in California
  • The Madrid complex is in Spain and managed by their national space agency
  • The Canberra complex is in Australia and managed by their national space agency

Also, fun fact, the Canberra complex has the only antenna that can communicate with Voyager 2!

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

I mean, it’s already up there and there’s no docking port for future service missions.

A lot of countries contributed to JWST, if the US drops it, someone else will pay people to keep it in orbit.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

From the article ...

NASA announced on Monday that it will be closing the Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy; the Office of the Chief Scientist; and the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) Branch of the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Twenty-three employees will be affected by the cuts,

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The title only claims that the process has started.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The title only claims that the process has started.

The article says "will be" (future tense), and not "has been so far". 🤷‍♂️

There may be more to come (knowing Elon/Trump), but I can only quote the article, ethically.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You seemed to imply with your bolded quote that this was inconsequential, so I only mean to point out that according to the title of the article that the attacks on NASA have started in a concrete way, not merely speculative anymore.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

You seemed to imply with your bolded quote that this was inconsequential,

No, was just highlighting the quantity of employees. People usually like to know how many are involved.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 17 points 23 hours ago

Trump's? Or Musk's?

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh! Oh! Can Canada get its aerospace engineers and industry back? We've been missing them ever since the Avro Arrow project got cancelled by American pressure and they all ended up in NASA.

[–] Moose@moose.best 3 points 21 hours ago

I would fucking love that. I find it unlikely but I really want to work in space manufacturing without moving to the USA. I know there are a handful of companies here, but not enough.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

The race to the bottom!

[–] ApeNo1@lemm.ee 13 points 23 hours ago

“It’s one small step backwards for man, it’s”, scans notes looking for last section of speech. Shrugs. “I think that’s it folks. One small step backwards it is.”

[–] mimavox@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago

Wait, weren't they going to take humanity into space?

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Science Mission Directorate cut by 50%?

It's not the people building the rockets getting cut the most.

It's the people studying the planets and responsible for understanding and protecting their state before human development s'encubre.

[–] seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes and it covers way more missions than most people would think, like the Mars rovers, all of our sample return efforts, etc. It would all but kill US planetary science.

Changing our space program from that of scientific exploration and understanding our neighbors to one of colonization and conquest.