General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
Hey infants, fuck you for being born poor, and girls, fuck you for being born female. Ooh, and fuck all of you for wanting physical health, and joy in arts.
I think they're removing free school meals for those who can afford it, as P1-5 seem to all get them. Which is how it works in the rest of the UK. You only get them if you need them (the criteria from my experience has been quite wide, there was a time I was eligible for it but my mum didn't feel like it was the morally right thing to do because we could actually afford it)
However removing the free period products is disgusting
for those who can afford it,
Yeah 2 issues with this.
Free school meals was not restarted as a fiscal support measure. It was designed to help ensure children get at least one healthy meal a day. Unfortunatly having an income in no way ensures parents know how to provide healthy nutrition. Infants being the age where healthy growth is most dependent on such things.
Second while above is true. It is also far from unheard of for young inexperienced parents to be above poverty income wise but suffer debt issues etc.
Old farts like me. Remember news of research from the 1950s to 80s, when all under 10yo children were given free meals at schools. Then this was cancelled in the 80s by thatcher. It was learned that the number of children not having a healthy meal in a day increased. This lead to nutrition issues and health issues in a sizable number of children treated by the NHS.
That's a good observation, actually.
Labour doubling down on "Sir Kid Starver" is certainly a look.
Odd behaviour from a Labour government, what's going on?
Starmer is going on.
Why do they always go after the most vulnerable first. Sickening.
love how this came out the same day rachel reeves admitted to accepting free sabrina carpenter tickets
This strikes me as bluffing between the DfE and Treasury.
"Oh, you want me to make 15% savings cuts do you? Here's what that looks like:"
In the hope that the Treasury backs down to at least some extent.
Just a correction. That particular15% demand. Was ordered to come from administrative costs. Basically firing civil servents. Not cuts to services provided. Reeves is still trying to deny its austerity. By taking direct decisions on cuts to actual services provided to the public.
The gov is claiming employment os civil services expanded drematically since covid. No idea if that is true. But the desperate attempt from 2 govs in a row to redefine words like austerity dose not fill me with trust. I feel the urge to disinfect anything that comes out of their mouths atm.
Fuck Labour.