this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1049 points (99.2% liked)

politics

22655 readers
3833 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vvilld@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Don't threaten us with a good time...

[–] samuelazers@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

The optimist angle would be that Trump is secretely a Democrat agent, and that by crashing the stock market he just thinks it's over-valued and wants to return to 2018~ levels.

[–] ZEDtheRED@lemm.ee 5 points 12 hours ago

Ah what a nice fantasy to cogitate on for a few moments

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 16 points 17 hours ago

Really? I don't think your idiot voters will remember for longer than 5 years. And with an opposition like the Dems it'll be easy for you to get back into power. Don't overestimate the Americans. We all made that mistake once.

[–] plantmoretrees@lemm.ee 6 points 14 hours ago

So, there is a silver lining?!

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Notice how he worries about HIS job... he couldn't care less about the harm to the country or the people

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

And whoever that fuckung prick was on the show clearly still defends Trump and says he has the intuition? This dude bankrupted four casinos. Just die already

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago
[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It would be too soon, if we got rid of them and these Corpo Dems. We could remove citizens United and few other worthless pieces of legislation. That and stop this fucking election tampering in the name "stopping fraud" fucking clowns making voting a single day during the work week and these Red hatted goons cheer for this shit like the mouth breathing inbred ghouls they are because they hate everyone else is beyond annoying.

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Citizens United wasn't legislation, it was a Supreme Court decision. The only way to fix it following the current rules is to ask the court again or to change the Constitution. Of course, if you are willing to just ignore laws then you have many options (see current Presidential administration for examples).

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 9 points 14 hours ago

No. Congress absolutely has the authority to enact legislation that overturns a court decision, even the Supreme Court.

However, the disgusting piles of human shaped filth currently making up the Supreme Court would find some illogical excuse for why said law is unconstitutional. But only once one of there lackeys manages to appeal the issue all the way up the chain. But this process IS utterly corrupt and subverts the Constitution...not like they care. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

But courts are given authority only to interpret existing legislation; their decisions do not restrict the legislature's authority to enact new laws. Thus the convoluted shit they come up with to abuse the appeals process, as mentioned.

[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Laws are fake anyway might as well

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Hawaii was recently successful in enacting state laws to limit campaign contributions. I'd hope that other states willing to tackle the fight could do the same. The biggest chance would be if it could be done in battleground states.

[–] ZEDtheRED@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

The court itself is beyond redemption. You and I both know there is only one way out of this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 43 points 23 hours ago (36 children)

Republicans should be wiped out. Fools, monsters, and traitors. They've done incalculable damage to the world and all those who live here.

Every Republican that dies should be cause for celebration.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 117 points 1 day ago (28 children)

The Republican party deserves to die for allowing Donald Trump to rise to power. The Democrat party deserves to die for being useless to stop them. America needs a whole new fresh start with new parties

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

Of course that’s all he cares about. Fuck him, I hope he loses everything he holds dear.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›