this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
1101 points (98.2% liked)

News

28416 readers
4439 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 hours ago

"United" States stands divided. It just gets worse...and at an incredible speed. It's always quicker and easier to demolish as opposed to building. Every one wants the easy money and the quick buck without a balanced expenditure of energy.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe Cali could make an agreement to join Canada or EU.

[–] DarthKaren@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

You'll need easy access to Canada. What better way than to have a close Canadian Province? - Wa state

[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

lol i'm considering a move to Tijuana so i can commute to San Diego.. if California can nix the chicken tax then i'm moving.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

It's really not legally possible, meaning your either having a revolution, a civil war, or the USA has no ability to stop you as it's effectively over.

Unless CA has military bases that would fully side with them, as in all the ones in CA and they would need other states, THEN a war could be possible, but that is very unlikely, currently there's no military that could beat the US military, so it's not even worth going over unless the US dissolves.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The civil war only happens if the U.S. attacks after a secession, but the state that single most funds the U.S. military is California, if you include Washington and Oregon in the secession you now end up with 19ish% of the countries budget and a sizable percentage of the military bases. With the American civil war there was somewhat defined lines of north vs south but this would be fights inside their own states.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

And the sentiment of half the East Coast (the one that matters) would be sympathetic to the secessionists

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (11 children)

How would a state secede from the US? Like, what’s the actual process?

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 41 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

The best way would be quiet quitting. Making routes to federal buildings surrounded by construction and road closures at odd times. Overlapping federal job descriptions internally and never communicating with federal equivalents unless required, and that with a “great email, still working on that!” Or “emailed Oregon about that and they had some great ideas, get with them for the data!”

Offering great state guard contracts to all military eligible to re-up, that exceed what the feds offer. Build out coastal protection fleet due to “them darn migrants.” Train your military in FPV as if you were what the US should be doing right now, so the feds know any pushback will be costly, and you’re not breaking any laws anyway, remember?

Tell your state and local police we don’t work with the FBI or IRS in cooperation any more, and let the populace know the feds must individually enforce all tax law. That’s where it’s good for the Feds to remember that’s not required, and the 4th amendment prevents them being forced to act… in fact, that makes them subject to arrest for trying due to the laws of the great state of california.

All legal, and petty. But legal.

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like you've been thinking of this... for a while already.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 7 points 17 hours ago

Only in minecraft.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

That's ingesting the ''I'll get right back to you'' form of revolution sounds more plausible than anything else I've heard. Just slow walk it to death.

[–] twitwat@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

this guy obstructs

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

The state government would put forwards a local movement to secede from the US, and if it actually passed the federal government would butt in and go "you can't secede, that's completely illegal and unconstitutional" (it is), at which point the state would either go "oh well" and stand down or say "go suck eggs" and continue trying to secede, which the federal government would treat as rebellion or insurrection.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, easy then! We know insurrections aren't a big deal and have no real consequences. Full steam ahead!

/s just in case

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

You need to amend the constitution which requires 38 states to agree to it that considering how many right wing states hate California doesn’t sound impossible

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

That's what the Civil War was about, there is no legal way to exit were one nation period end of story millions of dead soldiers proved it.

If a state tried to leave they would have to prove they could no matter the laws. It would be war. No ifs ands or buts. That means having a military that could take out the US military. Currently the top Airforce in the world is the US Airforce, the second largest Airforce is the US Navy, then it's Russia, then it's the US Army. Unless you can somehow convince the military to side with you when you leave, it's not going to happen. I would imagine if you tried to claim it legally the best you could hope for is Federal agents walking in the second said state gov claims independence, and idk arresting the heads of state for treason, and telling said state to elect a new gov.

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

But what is the US military going to do? go to a state that wants to secede and just kill everyone in it??

[–] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's not possible - you can check out but you can never leave

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

I wonder if the same thing was said about the USSR as late as 1988?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no process. States cannot just up and say "see ya" on their own, we fought a war over that.

If the people felt that it would be OK for a state to leave, the proper thing to do would be to pass an amendment stating a process, and then the state would do it. There would be a lot of details to hammer out: does the State get to keep Federal property (like military bases)? Does it inherit a share of the deficit? What happens to deferred US taxes on things like 401k accounts?

IMHO it would take so long to hammer that stuff out that it's basically impossible.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"But it's not legal!"

Have you learned nothing the past three months? Laws are what we make of them.

A state seceding is a simple process:

  1. The state passes an act to allow it.

  2. The sitting president endorses the idea and agrees to let them go peacefully.

That's it. The United States Constitution itself was illegally written, an exercise in simple willful power. State secession works the same way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] samuelazers@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

As i read this, i am remembered of Newsom meeting Trump, after he refused to help with Californian wildfires.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 13 hours ago

Why does that look like a photo of a bunch of Nazis?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social 16 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Anyone speaking of secession - please, read history. We do not want to do that again, I don’t care what you believe in, it is a terrible idea. Please think it through beyond how admittedly awesome it would be in theory alone.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago

It's a terrible idea, but so is invading Greenland, Canada, or Panama. We don't do such things anymore, read history why, but yet, here we are.

This is how a possible secession starts. Trump might prohibit California from doing this because it goes against his masters plan of destroying the US, California doesn't want to become a husk of it's former self and pushes through.

If California were to secede, it would immediately break the rest of the US. All the red states have been so poorly managed for decades that they near fully rely in handouts from successful states like California. With California gone, other blue and successful states would likely follow because they won't be able to pay the bill for those states either, splitting the US into a successful new country and dirt poor third world type theocratic dictatorship nation. Maybe it wouldn't be the worst thing, let the christo fascists live in the hell hole that they want

Secession(s) will likely include a civil war, and right now with the decade of trump shit causing division and chaos, I think that too isn't too far fetched anymore. There is nothing as horrible as neighbor fighting neighbors, ask Yugoslavia, but here we are in Trump's world.

Wouldn't MAGA supposedly be thrilled for California to leave?

I'm trying to imagine trumper militia marching into California saying, "we need to keep this liberal shithole and it's 54 blue electoral votes".

Yeah, it would be devastating for the US economy, but if MAGA has told us anything it's that they prefer to tank the economy than embrace any kind of diversity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Funnily enough, there's actually hostoric precedent for trying. Emphasis on trying.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Well, they could make a deal to buy at a price adjusted for tariffs so it's a lower price then compensate for that with lower prices on CA exports you don't actually need to stop tariffs legally, they can be worked around the trick is trading something back that makes up the difference and costs less than the tariff to give.

[–] SirFasy@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (6 children)

All hail The New California Republic. But in all seriousness, it wouldn't surprise me if the United States has a balkanization event happen in the near future.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (21 children)

The US does not need balkanization.

We have a single region that has been rebellious and trying to corrupt and destroy the rest of the union since the founding, because they cannot see any governmental or religious structure as legitimate unless it is founded on the principles of racism. This is their own words.

Lincoln was wrong to readmit the south, we should have let Sherman finish then build a wall around them, while letting any slaves who wanted to escape do so.

Either that or we need to restart reconstruction today with absolute brutality.

Before they committed treason against the US alone, this time they allied with Russia to bring us down.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

We have a single region that has been rebellious and trying to corrupt and destroy the rest of the union since the founding

Isn't a ton of the current Trump administration rot coming from Silicon Valley?

Isn't Silicon Valley in California?

Lincoln was wrong to readmit the south

The South was under the Reconstruction plan, complete with Marshall Law and Freedman's Bureaus and all sorts of additional federal oversight, untilThe Compromise of 1877 gave Rutherford B. Hayes the presidency at the cost of his soul.

Lincoln didn't simply readmit the South. He readmitted 9 million enslaved Americans as proper first class citizens. And the initial wave of democratization gave birth to a brief but generally optimistic egalitarian glimpse of a potential future.

Lincoln's big mistake was not putting Smedly Butler into his VP seat. Letting the country revert to Andrew Johnson was the big blunder. One that Grant had to spend two terms mopping up.

But that's all distant history. The modern fascist presidency is born out of Manhattan Island. The modern Texas/Florida/Ohio Axis of Evil is a product of Yale Business School. Stanford Alumni are fucking us up far more today than some Daughters of the Confederacy could have dreamed.

This isn't a North/South problem. It's a turf war between extractive industry and the professional class.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)

The two heads representing the east and west coasts, obviously (please let us join you, California, when you go).

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would be fun to watch companies from other states bypass the tariffs by buying California products.

Then of course, Trump will propose tariffs on a State.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›