this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1417 points (98.1% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19862 readers
547 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The idea feels like sci-fi because you're so used to it, imagining ads gone feels like asking to outlaw gravity. But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.

The traditional argument pro-advertising—that it provides consumers with necessary information—hasn't been valid for decades.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (17 children)

It would make promoting new art and events downright difficult.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] SorteKanin 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Isn't the problem with banning ads that you'd just gets "ads" that aren't marked as such? Like, ads are still going to happen, they just won't be clearly marked cause that would be illegal.

EDIT: Would love to hear how the downvoters would enforce an advertisement ban. What happens when an influencer randomly endorses a brand and then that brand also just coincidentally happens to give the influencer a "generous donation" or perhaps a life-time usage coupon?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

yeah basically the word of mouth and community networks will become ads and you will get things like leave five stars and get some shit with tell your friends and get some shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I see advertising as a necessary evil. It helps small businesses take off and stay afloat (especially when alternatives for being funded aren't viable for them), but at the same time it basically promotes corporate greed by shoving ads down our throats.

Abolishing advertising entirely would be improbable. I just want it to be toned down to the point where we're all comfortable with it. Too much of a good thing inevitably becomes a bad thing. But too little of a good thing is also a bad thing. So things should be taken in moderation. In the case of advertising, the first statement applies; there's way too much of it, it's really in-your-face and disruptive, and we're all getting sick of it.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How exactly do you define advertising? An overly broad definition would forbid, for example, a dentist from putting a sign in front of their office saying they're a dentist.

[–] Shayeta@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Paying somone else to advertise for you. You yourself holding up a sign peomoting yourself is fine, paying someone else to hold up a sign for you is illegal.

[–] Owlboi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

considering tons of free services are paid for with advertising, a lot of such services would cease to exist/be free.

be it websites such as youtube and streaming sites like twitch, or almost any website for that matter.

someone made a brand of water thats free and is entirely paid by advertising printed on the bottle, that would be gone too.

hell, i hate ads, but considering i use ublock, i havent seen any in years, and in real life you can just not look at them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

There were ads in ancient Rome, just to show how deep the rot goes.

[–] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Those who take issue with loss of profits without ads must take it up with big tech. They've have literal trillions of dollars from dominating the ad industry. They have your money. Nobody else.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As much as I'd be down with this I don't see it happening considering no one wants to pay for the services they use that are ad supported. For example everyone always seems to shit on YouTube premium but that is a currently existing way to get rid of ads on the service. Every time there's an option between ad supported and ad free but paid people tend to just pick ad free. So while I think outlawing ads would be good at least with the current state of the world it would only be a net negative, killing off a bunch of small and big websites that rely on ads.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›