this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
421 points (94.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

30722 readers
1900 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

~~Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion~~

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

People should be jailed for violating a DNR order.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Have you seen them violated often?

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

A few times. It's usually a close family member forcing them to be revived.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 10 points 10 hours ago

I was going to say "Copyright is theft" but I see that's basically OPs take, so I'll settle for 'same'.

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 59 points 14 hours ago (10 children)

That cats should remain indoors. Pet cats kill approximately 2.4 billion birds in the US alone, not to mention all the other animals that they also kill. I love cats as much as the next guy but keep them indoors for the love of nature

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Agree with you on IP and I agree it seems to be sadly a minority opinion.

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

As a rapper, I totally agree. I'll go with: decentralized community defense would be far more effective than the police. And, you know. Wouldn't be them.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I worry that more decentralization in us law enforcement would be even worse. It's far too easy for violent cops to shuffle from agency to agency with a paid vacation between bouts of oppression.

We don't even have standards for major things like rules of engagement with deadly force aligned nationwide. Further decentralization sounds a bit terrifying.

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm thinking, more like, you and your neighbors arm yourselves and be in each other's business.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

like a militia? or a lynch mob?

[–] Asswardbackaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Yup. I envision those existing. For example, In the area I come from, the "Bikers Against Child Abuse" exist. Maybe there's a Bikers Against Bikers Against Child Abuse? It's not pretty across the board, and if you peel back a single layer of the world right now, neither is it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Broadly speaking, I'm a Pacifist and believe any kind of military confrontation or military aid is bad public policy. The idea of collateral damage - civilian casualties taken in pursuit of military objectives - is fully immoral and should be broadly rejected. Military resources should be tasked first and foremost as disaster relief and recovery with the primary mission being the preservation of human life, rather than offensive missions to defeat or deter an opposition military.

Military reprisals (starting with the MAD policy and going down to retributive strikes in border disputes) are monstrous and should be ended. Military prisons should be closed and POWs immediately repatriated. Embargos, particularly those aimed at economically vulnerable nations like Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and North Korea, serve no useful purpose and should be lifted immediately. And the only offensive military action should be reserved for securing evacuation routes for refugees, with the bulk of resources dedicated to extending shelter and both immediate and long term relief to the refugees we accrue through these policies.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 33 points 14 hours ago

Violence against oil company shareholders is justified defense of yourself and others. Starting with a face slap for small-time diversified 401k oil investors.

[–] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

From my point of view of life, it feels like the belief of "Do unto others as you would like others to do to you" is no longer something most people seem to believe in.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] anon_most@lemmy.world 41 points 15 hours ago (15 children)

Open borders. I strongly believe in open borders as a moral imperative. Human beings have been migrating for survival, resources, and exploration for over 20,000 years. The concept of nation-states imposing constraints on movement is a modern invention that doesn't align with the inherent human need for freedom of mobility. People in the southwestern states of the US with Mexican roots will tell you "We didn't cross the border, the border crossed us."

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 44 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

The stock market should be illegal in all countries. Its basically a legalized gambling ponzii scheme.

Retirement also shouldn't be tied to this type of system.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lapping147@lemm.ee 11 points 12 hours ago

Buy local goods, even is it cost more... most people will go for cheapest price, even if you're handing your money to warlords and human trafficking.. same argument every time "There will always be ".

It

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 7 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

If I had no say in the creation of a system I should not have to participate in said system for the benefit of others.

[–] TripDawkins@lemmy.studio 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This is the basis for every sovereign citizen (aka "sovcits"); isn't it? Doesn't sovereign citizenry really only make sense if a sovcit goes "all the way"? I ask this because sovcits seem to partake in society's services provided by the collective (like roads, traffic signals, police, firefighters, etc.) while complaining about state overreach when (1) they have to pay something like property tax or (2) when they have to deal with LE. I'm not saying you're wrong to have a sovcit mentality, but doesn't a sovcit have to stop using society's services and put up a real defense when LE gets involved? I'm not recommending you do either; I'm just saying while the system is flawed, at least, Western "democracies" have one. The alternative seems to be (1) leaving the country or (2) fighting anybody who threatens your sovereignty.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›