this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
194 points (88.5% liked)

Memes

49682 readers
1114 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just because you can use hammers to hurt people doesn't mean we should ban all hammers.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

And just because people keep hammering screws doesn't mean hammers aren't useful.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

No Ai without UBI. Should have started UBI at least at the industrial revolution.

[–] Noam_Parenti@lemm.ee 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] msage@programming.dev -1 points 5 days ago

The current technology is a dead end, and we need to go back to the drawing board with it.

But before we can do that, we need to sell the current version, because we lost a lot of money on it....

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

AI is a tool. Misuse it and it sucks.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

under capitalism every tool is a tool for capitalism and will be misused.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

That's right.

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AI is a tool to transfer even more wealth, under the current conditions.

GenAIs are a mistake, but corps decided to stuff billions into it, and they want their money back.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like "the purpose of the system is what it does." Every invention that gets funding does that. I watched the development of ML techniques over the last decade or so; none of the researchers developing AI would have said that was the purpose. They had much loftier hopes for AI.

[–] msage@programming.dev 0 points 3 days ago

Yet the owners don't care.

I hate that it's pushed as a holy grail.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Ilixtze@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago

requiring state of the art GPU for a flesh light Is some kind of Futurama joke that i missed because I never watched Futurama.

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

LLMs seem to be great for translations and... transcriptions?

[–] justsquigglez@lemm.ee 7 points 5 days ago

I know Google sucks, but I will give a little credit to the newer Pixels' "Circle to Search" feature. It's nice to pull up an image and just circle search it and see where it came from, or the context behind it, etc etc.

Circle Search and the two you mention are probably the only actually useful things to come out of AI so far.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They really are! We should use tools for what they are good at and not try to cram AI into everything. Something something hammer, nail, right?

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 3 points 5 days ago

Yes. It's normal human behaviour. There is a hype, then a bubble, then... normalization.

Multimedia, keychain, blue LEDs, curved LCD screens, LLMs,... One of them is way less useful than the others.; P

[–] lowspeedchase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Summary stuff works really well too - I like to be able to bookmark a page and have tags/brief summary auto-gen'd

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Most of the time these abstracts are fine. But I'm wary of it because of the cases where it doesn't. :)

yeah, but for my personal bookmarks a hallucination is not a big deal, not exactly mission-critical lol

[–] CallateCoyote@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Like everything else since the advent of harnessing fire, it’s a double edged sword that can be used for good and evil.

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 5 points 5 days ago

I used to be excited for AI advancements 3 years ago. Now the situation is just trash. Good times when generating a Godzilla farting fire on a city was fun and cool

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 days ago

AI sucks, but HR sent me some forms to fill in and I would rather a shitty corpospeak AI response than putting effort into answering it myself.

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 2 points 5 days ago
[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

While AI offers transformative potential, significant criticisms highlight its drawbacks. Current systems often perpetuate biases embedded in training data, leading to discriminatory outcomes in hiring, law enforcement, and lending. The environmental cost of training large models—like massive energy consumption and carbon emissions—raises sustainability concerns. Automation driven by AI threatens job displacement, exacerbating economic inequality, while opaque "black-box" algorithms undermine accountability in critical domains like healthcare or criminal justice. Privacy erosion, through pervasive surveillance and data exploitation, further fuels distrust. Though AI’s capabilities are impressive, its unchecked deployment risks deepening societal inequities and prioritizing efficiency over ethical considerations.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org -5 points 5 days ago